Literature DB >> 7906329

Pressure sores and pressure-decreasing mattresses: controlled clinical trial.

A Hofman1, R H Geelkerken, J Wille, J J Hamming, J Hermans, P J Breslau.   

Abstract

Pressure sores are a problem, especially in elderly patients. Our study was designed to determine the effectiveness in pressure-sore prevention of a new interface-pressure decreasing mattress. In a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial we tested the Comfortex DeCube mattress (Comfortex, Winona, USA) against our standard hospital mattress in 44 patients with femoral-neck fracture and concomitant high pressure-sore risk score. In addition both groups were treated according to the Dutch consensus protocol for the prevention of pressure sores. On admission and 1 and 2 weeks after admission, pressure sores were graded. The two groups were similar in patient characteristics and pressure-sore risk factors. At 1 week, 25% of the patients nursed on the DeCube mattress and 64% of the patients nursed on the standard mattress had clinically relevant pressure sores (grade 2 or more). At 2 weeks the figures were 24% and 68%, respectively. The maximum score over the several body regions of the pressure-sore grading, measured on a 5-point sale, was significantly different in favour of the DeCube mattress at 1 week (p = 0.0043) and 2 weeks (p = 0.0067) postoperatively. We show that the occurrence of pressure sores and their severity can be significantly reduced when patients at risk are nursed on an interface-pressure decreasing mattress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7906329     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91521-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  14 in total

1.  Risk assessment scales poorly predict pressure ulceration.

Authors:  Peter J Franks; Christine J Moffatt; Donna Chaloner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-18

2.  Preventing and treating pressure sores.

Authors:  N Cullum; J J Deeks; A W Fletcher; T A Sheldon; F Song
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-12

Review 3.  Best practices for elderly hip fracture patients. A systematic overview of the evidence.

Authors:  Lauren A Beaupre; C Allyson Jones; L Duncan Saunders; D William C Johnston; Jeanette Buckingham; Sumit R Majumdar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Assessment and management of pressure ulcers in the elderly: current strategies.

Authors:  Efraim Jaul
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-10

6.  Definitions of the physical properties of pressure ulcers and characterisation of their regional variance.

Authors:  Fumihiro Mizokami; Katsunori Furuta; Atsushi Utani; Zenzo Isogai
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Pressure ulcer prevention: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-04-01

8.  Alternative reactive support surfaces (non-foam and non-air-filled) for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 9.  Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Elizabeth McInnes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Sally E M Bell-Syer; Jo C Dumville; Victoria Middleton; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-03

10.  Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.