Literature DB >> 7905552

Ventricular tachycardia as default diagnosis in broad complex tachycardia.

M J Griffith1, C J Garratt, P Mounsey, A J Camm.   

Abstract

In the differential diagnosis of broad-complex tachycardia, the most important decision is whether or not the tachycardia is ventricular, since this type carries the worst prognosis. However, the rules for a diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia are so complex that they are not satisfied in many cases, and the default diagnosis, supraventricular tachycardia, is erroneously accepted. We sought to reverse this strategy; unless simple rules for a positive diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia were satisfied, ventricular tachycardia was diagnosed by default. The criterion for a diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia was electrocardiographic (ECG) findings typical of bundle branch block (left = rS or QS wave in leads V1 and V2, delay to S wave nadir < 70 ms, and R wave and no Q wave in lead V6; right = rSR' wave in lead V1 and an RS wave in lead V6, with R wave height greater than S wave depth). Twelve-lead ECGs were done for 102 consecutive patients with broad-complex tachycardia (QRS width > 110 ms). Two observers, who were unaware of definitive diagnoses validated by electrophysiology, by our diagnostic rules made correct diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia in 63 and 62 of 69 patients, respectively, and correct diagnoses of supraventricular tachycardia in 28 and 22 of 33 patients (sensitivity for ventricular tachycardia 90% and 91%, specificity 67% and 85%). One observer then sought independent P waves in cases diagnosed as supraventricular tachycardia; sensitivity for the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia rose to 96%, with a specificity of 64%. These criteria, which require only knowledge of typical bundle branch block patterns, were highly sensitive for the important diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7905552     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91223-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  12 in total

Review 1.  The diagnosis and management of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Dennis H Lau; Prashanthan Sanders
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  The use of echocardiographic colour kinetic wall motion to differentiate broad complex tachycardia.

Authors:  T Hunt; S Tong; M Burrows; M James
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Specificity of wide QRS complex tachycardia criteria and algorithms in patients with ventricular preexcitation.

Authors:  Marek Jastrzębski; Paweł Moskal; Piotr Kukla; Kamil Fijorek; Roksana Kisiel; Danuta Czarnecka
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  [Regular tachycardia with broad QRS complex: differential diagnosis on 12-lead ECG].

Authors:  B Schumacher; S Spehl; A Langbein; A Schade; S Kerber; M Koller
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-04-18

Review 5.  [Ventricular arrhythmias : What has been confirmed in therapy?]

Authors:  D Duncker; J Bauersachs; C Veltmann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Wide Complex Tachycardia - Ventricular Tachycardia or Not Ventricular Tachycardia, That Remains the Question.

Authors:  John B Garner; John M Miller
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2013-04

7.  Wide Complex Tachycardias: Understanding this Complex Condition: Part 1 - Epidemiology and Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Gus M Garmel
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-01

Review 8.  Current algorithms for the diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardias.

Authors:  Andras Vereckei
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2014-08

Review 9.  Wide Complex Tachycardia Differentiation: A Reappraisal of the State-of-the-Art.

Authors:  Anthony H Kashou; Peter A Noseworthy; Christopher V DeSimone; Abhishek J Deshmukh; Samuel J Asirvatham; Adam M May
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  The limited utility of electrocardiography variables used to predict arrhythmia in psychotropic drug overdose.

Authors:  Nicholas A Buckley; Stephan Chevalier; I Anne Leditschke; Dianne L O'Connell; James Leitch; Susan M Pond
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.