PURPOSE: To use the pig brain as a large-animal model to examine the effects of high-dose single-fraction irradiation on MR images, T2 relaxation time, and histologic integrity. METHODS: A total of 24 Meishan pigs were studied: 20 irradiated animals and 4 unirradiated controls. A high dose was delivered to the right hemisphere of the animals, using a 12-MeV electron beam. Ten animals received 40 Gy at the 90% isodose, and 10 animals received 60 Gy. Quantitative measurement of T2 relaxation time was compared with qualitative analysis of T2-weighted images and histologic studies. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis revealed a reproducible increase of the T2 parameter within the irradiated areas. The T2 kinetic could be analyzed in two phases, which appeared before the visualization of ventricle compression, necrosis, and edema. The first is characterized by vascular inflammation and the latter by radiation necrosis and edema. Both are dose dependent. CONCLUSION: These results underline the ability of quantitative MR for early diagnosis of brain radiation lesions in vivo.
PURPOSE: To use the pig brain as a large-animal model to examine the effects of high-dose single-fraction irradiation on MR images, T2 relaxation time, and histologic integrity. METHODS: A total of 24 Meishan pigs were studied: 20 irradiated animals and 4 unirradiated controls. A high dose was delivered to the right hemisphere of the animals, using a 12-MeV electron beam. Ten animals received 40 Gy at the 90% isodose, and 10 animals received 60 Gy. Quantitative measurement of T2 relaxation time was compared with qualitative analysis of T2-weighted images and histologic studies. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis revealed a reproducible increase of the T2 parameter within the irradiated areas. The T2 kinetic could be analyzed in two phases, which appeared before the visualization of ventricle compression, necrosis, and edema. The first is characterized by vascular inflammation and the latter by radiation necrosis and edema. Both are dose dependent. CONCLUSION: These results underline the ability of quantitative MR for early diagnosis of brain radiation lesions in vivo.
Authors: E Hattingen; A Jurcoane; M Nelles; A Müller; U Nöth; B Mädler; P Mürtz; R Deichmann; H H Schild Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Mike E Robbins; Judy K Brunso-Bechtold; Ann M Peiffer; Christina I Tsien; Janet E Bailey; Lawrence B Marks Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Adriana M Pietsch; Andrea Viehöver; Ricarda Diem; Markus Weiler; Mirjam Korporal-Kuhnke; Brigitte Wildemann; Georges Sam; John M Hayes; Olivia Fösleitner; Johann M E Jende; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Jennifer C Hayes Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Roger E McLendon; Gamal Akabani; Henry S Friedman; David A Reardon; Linda Cleveland; Ilkcan Cokgor; James E Herndon; Carol Wikstrand; Susan T Boulton; Allan H Friedman; Darell D Bigner; Michael R Zalutsky Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2007-03-30 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Joseph S Pekala; Alexander C Mamourian; Heather A Wishart; William F Hickey; James D Raque Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; S Tomiguchi; Y Shigematsu; I Ikushima; T Kira; L Liang; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 4.966