| Literature DB >> 7900286 |
T M Dijkstra1, V Cornilleau-Pérès, C C Gielen, J Droulez.
Abstract
We compare the performance in the detection of the shape of concave, planar and convex surfaces for small-field (8 deg) and large-field (90 deg) stimuli. Shape is perceived from head translations, object translations and object rotations. We find large differences between small-field and large-field stimulation. For small-field stimulation performance is best for object rotation, intermediate for self-motion and worst for object translation. For large-field stimulation performance is similar across conditions. Few errors on the sign of the curvature are found for self-motion for both field sizes, indicating that self-motion information disambiguates the curvature sign. For object rotation with small-field stimulation, the concave-convex ambiguity is strong with many apparent deformations. In contrast, large-field curvature signs are always accurately reported, suggesting that the weight of the rigidity hypothesis depends on field size.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1995 PMID: 7900286 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00147-e
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vision Res ISSN: 0042-6989 Impact factor: 1.886