Literature DB >> 7900286

Perception of three-dimensional shape from ego- and object-motion: comparison between small- and large-field stimuli.

T M Dijkstra1, V Cornilleau-Pérès, C C Gielen, J Droulez.   

Abstract

We compare the performance in the detection of the shape of concave, planar and convex surfaces for small-field (8 deg) and large-field (90 deg) stimuli. Shape is perceived from head translations, object translations and object rotations. We find large differences between small-field and large-field stimulation. For small-field stimulation performance is best for object rotation, intermediate for self-motion and worst for object translation. For large-field stimulation performance is similar across conditions. Few errors on the sign of the curvature are found for self-motion for both field sizes, indicating that self-motion information disambiguates the curvature sign. For object rotation with small-field stimulation, the concave-convex ambiguity is strong with many apparent deformations. In contrast, large-field curvature signs are always accurately reported, suggesting that the weight of the rigidity hypothesis depends on field size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7900286     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00147-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  3 in total

1.  Retinal slip during active head motion and stimulus motion.

Authors:  C C A M Gielen; S F Gabel; J Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Detection of the sign of expansion as a function of field size and eccentricity.

Authors:  S F te Pas; A M Kappers; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

3.  Perceived surface slant is systematically biased in the actively-generated optic flow.

Authors:  Carlo Fantoni; Corrado Caudek; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.