Literature DB >> 7899977

The growth of the lumbar vertebral canal.

T Papp1, R W Porter, R M Aspden.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study examines the growth and development of the lumbar spinal canal with emphasis on early life.
OBJECTIVE: Changes in dimensions of the canal were investigated throughout life. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Seven hundred and fifteen lumbar vertebrae were examined from the Spitalfield Collection of Skeletons at the Natural History Museum, London.
METHODS: Unmagnified silhouette pictures were taken of the canals with a specially designed photographic box. Computerized image analysis provided the accurate measurements.
RESULTS: Regarding the midsagittal diameter and the cross-sectional area, the cranial four lumbar vertebrae were already fully matured in infants. At L5 there was significant increase up to 4 years of age when the midsagittal diameter was even larger than in the adult. The interpedicular diameter significantly increased at L1 until 10 years of age, at the other levels until adulthood, as did the perimeter at L4 and L5 until 14 years of age. The shape of the canal was assessed by measuring the circularity, the 'trefoilness' and the situation of the centroid. The first measurement significantly decreased with age, the trefoilness increased until adulthood, and the centroid of the canal approached the vertebral body. In spines with spina bifida occulta, the lumbar canal was significantly larger proximal to the lesion than in the unaffected spines.
CONCLUSION: The lumbar spinal canal exhausts its growth potential by infancy as regards the midsagittal diameter and the cross-sectional area. Thus, in the case of delayed development, it is not capable of catch-up growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7899977     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199412150-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Three-dimensional sonographic evaluation of the fetal lumbar spinal canal.

Authors:  Thomas Wallny; Ralf L Schild; Rolf Fimmers; Manfred E Hansmann
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Congenital spinal dermal sinuses: poor awareness leads to delayed treatment.

Authors:  R Ramnarayan; A Dominic; J Alapatt; N Buxton
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Population reference range for developmental lumbar spinal canal size.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Junbin Huang; Sheung-Wai Law; Fan Xiao; Jason Chi Shun Leung; Defeng Wang; Lin Shi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

4.  Normal values of the sagittal diameter of the lumbar spine (vertebral body and dural sac) in children measured by MRI.

Authors:  Walter Knirsch; Claudia Kurtz; Nicole Häffner; Mathias Langer; Deniz Kececioglu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-01-06

5.  Posterior approach lumbar and thoracolumbar hemivertebra resection in congenital scoliosis in children under 10 years of age: results with 3 years mean follow up.

Authors:  Marco Crostelli; Osvaldo Mazza; Massimo Mariani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Posterior hemivertebra resection with bisegmental fusion for congenital scoliosis: more than 3 year outcomes and analysis of unanticipated surgeries.

Authors:  Shengru Wang; Jianguo Zhang; Guixing Qiu; Shugang Li; Bin Yu; Xisheng Weng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Spinal canal dimensions affect outcome of adolescent disc herniation.

Authors:  O Linkoaho; R Kivisaari; M Ahonen
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.