Literature DB >> 7898964

Pulmonary mechanics in ventilated preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome after exogenous surfactant administration: a comparison between two surfactant preparations.

M L Choukroun1, B Llanas, H Apere, M Fayon, R I Galperine, H Guenard, J L Demarquez.   

Abstract

The effects of two surfactant preparations on lung mechanics have been studied on 24 ventilated premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS): 13 were given artificial surfactant (Exosurf Neonatal, Burroughs-Wellcome) and 11 natural porcine surfactant (Curosurf, Laboratoire Serono France). Measurements of respiratory system compliance (Cdyn, Crs) and resistance (Rrs) were performed immediately before surfactant administration and repeated 6, 18, 24, 48, and 72 hours later. With Exosurf treatment, 6 hours after surfactant administration inhaled O2 concentration (FlO2) could be lowered from (0.72 +/- 0.20, to 0.62 +/- 0.33; P < 0.05), whereas Crs did not change (0.37 mL/cmH2O/kg, +/- 0.14 vs. 0.39 +/- 0.12, NS). After 24 hours and during the following days a significant increase in Crs occurred (24 hours post-Exosurf: 0.51 +/- 0.18, P < 0.05). With Curosurf treatment, the improvement in oxygenation was greater and FlO2 could be lowered much more after 6 hours (from FlO2, 0.78 +/- 0.23 to 0.34 +/- 0.11, P < 0.01). This was associated with an increase in Crs (from 0.39 +/- 0.09 to 0.59 +/- 0.17, P < 0.05). During the following days, Crs was significantly higher in the group treated with Curosurf. Resistance was not altered by the type of surfactant preparation used except after 72 hours, when Rrs increased in the group treated with Exosurf. In conclusion, Curosurf appears to be more effective than Exosurf with regard to immediate pulmonary changes in ventilator treated premature infants with RDS. A rapid increase in Crs after Curosurf treatment indicates that recruitment of new functional areas of the lung is likely to be associated with a stabilization of small airways and alveolar units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7898964     DOI: 10.1002/ppul.1950180502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol        ISSN: 1099-0496


  6 in total

Review 1.  Lung surfactants for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: animal-derived or synthetic agents?

Authors:  Gautham K Suresh; Roger F Soll
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  A risk-benefit assessment of natural and synthetic exogenous surfactants in the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  H Walti; M Monset-Couchard
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Surfactant therapy for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Krishnan Raghavendran; D Willson; R H Notter
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 4.  Pharmacotherapy of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Krishnan Raghavendran; Gloria S Pryhuber; Patricia R Chess; Bruce A Davidson; Paul R Knight; Robert H Notter
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Surfactant for pediatric acute lung injury.

Authors:  Douglas F Willson; Patricia R Chess; Robert H Notter
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.278

Review 6.  Animal derived surfactant extract versus protein free synthetic surfactant for the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Stephanie Ardell; Robert H Pfister; Roger Soll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.