Literature DB >> 7898829

Serious adverse events in Norplant users reported to the Food and Drug Administration's MedWatch Spontaneous Reporting System.

D K Wysowski1, L Green.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe serious adverse events in Norplant users from reports submitted to the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) MedWatch Spontaneous Reporting System.
METHODS: Reports of certain serious adverse events in Norplant users in the United States from February 1991 to December 1993 were reviewed and analyzed.
RESULTS: From the introduction of Norplant in the United States in February 1991 to December 1993, the FDA received reports of 24 women hospitalized for infections at the insertion site, 14 hospitalized or disabled because of difficulties removing the capsules, 14 hospitalized for stroke, three for thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura, six for thrombocytopenia, and 39 for pseudotumor cerebri. The comparison of reported rates with expected rates and the relationship of some of these disorders with oral contraceptives raises the suspicion of a causal association with Norplant.
CONCLUSIONS: The FDA has received reports of hospitalization or disability for infections, capsule removal difficulties, stroke, thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura, thrombocytopenia, and pseudotumor cerebri in Norplant users. Health care professionals need to be trained in Norplant insertion and removal to ensure the proper technique. Studies are needed to determine if stroke, thrombocytopenia, and pseudotumor cerebri are causally related to Norplant use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7898829     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00457-O

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

1.  Teen sex, AIDS, and contraception: part two.

Authors:  G Dawson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 2.  Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. Contraception on trial.

Authors:  M L Frank; C DiMaria
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability.

Authors:  A J Coukell; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  A Population-Based, Case-Control Evaluation of the Association Between Hormonal Contraceptives and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Khin P Kilgore; Michael S Lee; Jacqueline A Leavitt; Ryan D Frank; Collin M McClelland; John J Chen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 5.  Risks and benefits, advantages and disadvantages of levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.

Authors:  Irving Sivin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  An Estimation of the Risk of Pseudotumor Cerebri among Users of the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device.

Authors:  Reuben M Valenzuela; Ruju Rai; Brian H Kirk; Jessica N Sanders; Subhashree Sundar; Steffen Hamann; Judith E A Warner; Kathleen B Digre; Alison V Crum; Kirtly P Jones; Bradley J Katz
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2017-04-19

7.  Clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Huan Zhou; Yang Jiao; Chu-Fan Ma; Chao Wang; San-Jun Zhao; Min Tian; Franklin R Tay; Ji-Hua Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

Review 8.  Implantable Drug Delivery Systems and Foreign Body Reaction: Traversing the Current Clinical Landscape.

Authors:  Alexey Fayzullin; Alesia Bakulina; Karen Mikaelyan; Anatoly Shekhter; Anna Guller
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.