Literature DB >> 7898823

Value of wet mount and cervical cultures at the time of cervical cytology in asymptomatic women.

G H Eltabbakh1, G D Eltabbakh, F F Broekhuizen, B T Griner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To correlate Papanicolaou smear findings with the wet mount and cervical culture results in asymptomatic patients, and to review the value of doing wet mount and/or cervical cultures in these patients at the time of Papanicolaou smear.
METHODS: Asymptomatic women presenting for routine Papanicolaou smears at Sinai Samaritan Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, between January 1991 and January 1994 were studied by preparing wet mount (saline and potassium hydroxide preparations) and cervical cultures for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae at the same visit. Fisher exact test and Pearson chi 2 statistics were applied.
RESULTS: Nine hundred sixty-three patients were studied. Nearly 50% of our asymptomatic young urban women had a vaginal and/or cervical infection. Papanicolaou smears with inflammation were associated with bacterial vaginosis (P < .0001), excess white blood cells (P < .0001), trichomoniasis (P < .0001), abnormal wet mounts in general (P < .0001), and positive cervical cultures for C trachomatis and/or N gonorrhoeae (P < .001). Papanicolaou smears showing atypical cells of undetermined significance were associated with bacterial vaginosis (P < .001) and abnormal wet mounts in general (P < .03). Seventy-five percent of patients with positive cervical cultures had abnormal wet mounts. Eighty-three percent of the patients whose initial Papanicolaou smear showed inflammation and whose initial wet mount was abnormal had a normal Papanicolaou smear when the wet mount became normal.
CONCLUSION: Preparing wet mounts at the time of Papanicolaou smear in asymptomatic young urban women will help in the interpretation of minimally abnormal smears and will probably decrease the need for repeat smears and colposcopy. Simultaneous cervical cultures would not add much information for such interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7898823     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00450-R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Gynecologic Complications of Bacterial Vaginosis: Fact or Fiction?

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  Evaluation and management of vaginitis.

Authors:  P L Carr; D Felsenstein; R H Friedman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Association between bacterial vaginosis and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evy Gillet; Joris F A Meys; Hans Verstraelen; Rita Verhelst; Philippe De Sutter; Marleen Temmerman; Davy Vanden Broeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Gynecologic conditions and bacterial vaginosis: implications for the non-pregnant patient.

Authors:  R L Sweet
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000

5.  Inflammation on the cervical papanicolaou smear: evidence for infection in asymptomatic women?

Authors:  Stavroula Baka; Ioanna Tsirmpa; Anthia Chasiakou; Iliana Tsouma; Ekaterina Politi; Vassiliki Gennimata; Evangelia Kouskouni
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09-24

6.  Current Chlamydia trachomatis Infection, A Major Cause of Infertility.

Authors:  Jayanti Mania-Pramanik; Shilpa Kerkar; Shobha Sonawane; Pratibha Mehta; Vinita Salvi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2012-10

7.  Evaluation of microbial enzymes in normal and abnormal cervicovaginal fluids of cervical dysplasia: a case control study.

Authors:  Subramanyam Dasari; Wudayagiri Rajendra; Lokanatha Valluru
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.