Literature DB >> 7898822

A comparison of computer-based and personal interviews for the gynecologic history update.

S Hasley1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients would answer a computer-based interview in the same way as they would answer a personal interview.
METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients in a private practice setting were asked a set of eleven questions relating to their general and gynecologic health. The question set included issues appropriate to a routine, periodic gynecologic history update. Each subject was asked the same question set twice, once by a personal interview and once by a computer. This was done in a crossover fashion. One-half of the subjects were interviewed by a person first; the other half used the computer first.
RESULTS: Statistical evaluation demonstrated that patient responses are equivalent. The two methods agreed overall in 96% of the responses. Analysis of the discordant responses showed that in some cases, the computer may be more effective than the personal interview in identifying risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: A computer-based questionnaire can generate responses that are equivalent to the responses to a traditional personal interview. In some cases, a computer may be more successful in eliciting risk factors. Further studies of the application of this technology for patient education and physician efficiency can now be carried out, knowing that subjects respond reproducibly to a computer interview format.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7898822     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00012-G

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Data quality and the electronic medical record: a role for direct parental data entry.

Authors:  S C Porter; K D Mandl
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes.

Authors:  Jessica Clark Newman; Don C Des Jarlais; Charles F Turner; Jay Gribble; Phillip Cooley; Denise Paone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Does the use of an automated tool for self-reporting mood by patients with bipolar disorder bias the collected data?

Authors:  Michael Bauer; Natalie Rasgon; Paul Grof; Laszlo Gyulai; Tasha Glenn; Peter C Whybrow
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-08-25

4.  A Social Needs Assessment Tool for an Urban Latino Population.

Authors:  Beth A Careyva; Roya Hamadani; Timothy Friel; Cathy A Coyne
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-02

5.  Clandestine induced abortion: prevalence, incidence and risk factors among women in a Latin American country.

Authors:  Antonio Bernabé-Ortiz; Peter J White; Cesar P Carcamo; James P Hughes; Marco A Gonzales; Patricia J Garcia; Geoff P Garnett; King K Holmes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Differential response effects of data collection mode in a cancer screening study of unmarried women ages 40-75 years: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; Michelle L Rogers; Gene F Armstrong; William Rakowski; Frederick J Kviz
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Factors Associated With Smoking Status among HIV-Positive Patients in Routine Clinical Care.

Authors:  Cosmas M Zyambo; James H Willig; Karen L Cropsey; April P Carson; Craig Wilson; Ashutosh R Tamhane; Andrew O Westfall; Greer A Burkholder
Journal:  J AIDS Clin Res       Date:  2015-07-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.