Literature DB >> 7898110

A national quality improvement effort: cancer registry data.

R E Clive1, K M Ocwieja, L Kamell, S S Hoyler, J E Seiffert, J L Young, D E Henson, D P Winchester, R T Osteen, H R Menck.   

Abstract

Cancer registries are sources of epidemiological, patterns-of-care, and outcome data for local, regional, state, and national studies of patients with cancer. Since 1976, these registries have formed a voluntary network of contributors to annual patient care studies under the aegis of the National Cancer Data Committee of the Commission on Cancer. These annual studies provide timely clinical information that is widely disseminated to physicians, allied health personnel, administrators, health care planners, and public and private agencies. The use of the data has grown exponentially and has been the basis for more than 90 publications. Merging this activity with the National Cancer Data Base has further expanded the demand and use of registry data. This study was undertaken to respond to inquiries as to the validity of the data and the qualifications and competency of cancer registrars. It provides the baseline for cancer registry data quality and serves as a quality management tool to identify opportunities to enhance data quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7898110     DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930580304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  9 in total

Review 1.  Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework.

Authors:  Danielle G T Arts; Nicolette F De Keizer; Gert-Jan Scheffer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  The Lombardia Stroke Unit Registry: 1-year experience of a web-based hospital stroke registry.

Authors:  Giuseppe Micieli; Anna Cavallini; Silvana Quaglini; Giancarlo Fontana; Michela Duè
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Brain tumor survival: results from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  T S Surawicz; F Davis; S Freels; E R Laws; H R Menck
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Adverse drug event reporting systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chantelle Bailey; David Peddie; Maeve E Wickham; Katherin Badke; Serena S Small; Mary M Doyle-Waters; Ellen Balka; Corinne M Hohl
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Need of informatics in designing interoperable clinical registries.

Authors:  Majid Rastegar-Mojarad; Sunghwan Sohn; Liwei Wang; Feichen Shen; Troy C Bleeker; William A Cliby; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Analysis of medical-decision making and the use of standards of care in oncology.

Authors:  S Holzer; A M Fremgen; S A Hundahl; J Dudeck
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

7.  Quantifying data quality for clinical trials using electronic data capture.

Authors:  Meredith L Nahm; Carl F Pieper; Maureen M Cunningham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Inter-rater reliability of data elements from a prototype of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry.

Authors:  Mathew J Reeves; Andrew J Mullard; Susan Wehner
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Strategies for improving the data quality in national hospital discharge data system: a delphi study.

Authors:  Farahnaz Sadoughi; Zahra Mahmoudzadeh-Sagheb; Maryam Ahmadi
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2013-12-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.