Literature DB >> 7897456

Appropriateness and variation of surgical treatment of breast cancer in Italy: when excellence in clinical research does not match with generalized good quality care. Progetto Oncologia Femminile.

N Scorpiglione1, A Nicolucci, R Grilli, C Angiolini, M Belfiglio, F Carinci, D Cubasso, G Filardo, D Labbrozzi, F Mainini.   

Abstract

To assess appropriateness of surgical care delivered to breast cancer patients in Italy and quantify the use of unnecessary radical procedures, a retrospective charts review of patients treated in 1988-1989 was conducted. A series of 1724 consecutive patients (median age 61 years; range 17-89) treated in 63 hospitals selected from within 8 regions with newly diagnosed operable breast carcinoma was evaluated. Overall, 541 (38%) patients had inappropriate surgery with more than two thirds of it being accounted for by the use of unnecessary mutilating Halsted mastectomy. Substantial geographic variation emerged in the overall rates of appropriateness (range 88-52%) which were not substantially affected by allowance for imbalances in patient- and hospital-related variables. Despite the important contribution given by Italian clinical researchers to the demonstration that less radical surgery can be as good as more radical procedures, still a substantial proportion of breast cancer patients are treated too aggressively. Besides pointing to the urgent need of interventions aimed at facilitating the process of technology transfer in order to promote more appropriate surgical care, these results suggest that efforts to increase patients' participation into treatment decision and awareness about alternative treatment options are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7897456     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00148-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; A Liberati; R Grilli; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-12

2.  Variations in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer in Quebec between 1988 and 1994.

Authors:  N Hébert-Croteau; J Brisson; J Latreille; C Blanchette; L Deschênes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-10-19       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol A. Sawka; Vivek Goel; Catherine A. Mahut; Glen A. Taylor; Elaine C. Thiel; Annette M. O'Connor; Ida Ackerman; Janet H. Burt; Elaine H. Gort
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Effects of specialisation on treatment and outcomes in screen-detected breast cancers in Wales: cohort study.

Authors:  P C Allgood; M O Bachmann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Guideline adherence for early breast cancer before and after introduction of the sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  M Schaapveld; E G E de Vries; R Otter; J de Vries; W V Dolsma; P H B Willemse
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-09-05       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  The population-based oncological health care study OVIS - recruitment of the patients and analysis of the non-participants.

Authors:  Ron Pritzkuleit; Annika Waldmann; Heiner Raspe; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Indicators of breast cancer severity and appropriateness of surgery based on hospital administrative data in the Lazio Region, Italy.

Authors:  Patrizia Schifano; Paolo Papini; Nera Agabiti; Marina Scarinci; Piero Borgia; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Specialisation and breast cancer survival in the screening era.

Authors:  D Kingsmore; A Ssemwogerere; D Hole; C Gillis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.