Literature DB >> 7897455

Diagnostic classification of female urinary incontinence: an epidemiological survey corrected for validity.

H Sandvik1, S Hunskaar, A Vanvik, H Bratt, A Seim, R Hermstad.   

Abstract

Diagnostic questions about stress and urge incontinence were validated against a final diagnosis made by a gynecologist after urodynamic evaluation. Thereafter, an epidemiological survey was performed, using similar questions, and correcting the answers for lack of validity. Included were 250 incontinent women at the out-patient clinic and 535 women who reported incontinence in the epidemiological survey. The sensitivity for stress incontinence was 0.66 (95% confidence interval +/- 0.08), specificity 0.88 (+/- 0.06). The corresponding values for urge incontinence were 0.56 (+/- 0.15) and 0.96 (+/- 0.03), and for mixed incontinence 0.84 (+/- 0.10) and 0.66 (+/- 0.07). Using these indices of validity as corrective measures for the diagnostic distribution reported in the epidemiological survey, the percentage of stress incontinence increased from 51 to 77%, while mixed incontinence was reduced from 39 to 11%. Pure urge incontinence increased from 10 to 12%. Mixed incontinence will be overreported in epidemiological surveys. Correction for validity indicates that a larger majority than hitherto reported may have pure stress incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7897455     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00147-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  63 in total

Review 1.  Office management of urinary incontinence among older patients.

Authors:  Christopher Frank; Agata Szlanta
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Midurethral slings for women with urodynamic mixed incontinence: what to expect?

Authors:  Stavros Athanasiou; Themos Grigoriadis; George Giannoulis; Athanasios Protopapas; Aris Antsaklis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Diabetes, Glycemic Control, and Urinary Incontinence in Women.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Roger Lefevre; Michele R Hacker; Toni H Golen
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy, Sexual Dysfunction, and Urinary Incontinence in Women With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  James M Hotaling; Aruna V Sarma; Darshan P Patel; Barbara H Braffett; Patricia A Cleary; Eva Feldman; William H Herman; Catherine L Martin; Alan M Jacobson; Hunter Wessells; Rodica Pop-Busui
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Addressing the need for a simpler algorithm for the management of women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Lars Viktrup
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-08-01

6.  The standardised proactive assessment instrument.

Authors: 
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  2002-02

7.  Familial risk of urinary incontinence in women: population based cross sectional study.

Authors:  Yngvild S Hannestad; Rolv Terje Lie; Guri Rortveit; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-16

8.  Oral contraceptive use and incident urinary incontinence in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Mary K Townsend; Gary C Curhan; Neil M Resnick; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Physical activity and incident urinary incontinence in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Mary K Townsend; Kim N Danforth; Bernard Rosner; Gary C Curhan; Neil M Resnick; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  A screening tool for clinically relevant urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; Rodney L Dunn; Daniel M Morgan; John O L DeLancey; Karl T Rew; John T Wei
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 2.696

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.