Literature DB >> 7897071

The impact of perceived medical dominance on the workplace satisfaction of Australian and British nurses.

B J Adamson1, D T Kenny, J Wilson-Barnett.   

Abstract

Current literature on the sociology of health views medical dominance as a structural feature of the health division of labour, and a body of literature has developed exploring the structural components contributing to the subordination of the allied health professions. In this paper, nursing literature describing the nature and source of nurses' perceptions, complaints and dissatisfactions with their profession, and sociological analyses of the position of nurses within the structure of the health care delivery system, were employed to provide a framework for assessing the degree to which structural medical dominance of the nursing profession impinges on nurses' perceptions of dominance and how these perceptions affect nurses' workplace satisfaction. A 69-item questionnaire covering aspects of doctor-nurse, doctor-patient, nurse-patient and nurse-hospital administration relationships was developed. One-hundred and thirty-three Australian nurses and 108 British nurses completed the questionnaire, in which they ranked their own level of professional satisfaction and the level of satisfaction they perceived doctors to experience. Results indicated that Australian and British nurses were not only dissatisfied with many aspects of their work environment, such as their pay and working conditions, but also experienced dissatisfaction with their professional status while perceiving the medical profession to be highly satisfied. British nurses were significantly more dissatisfied with their own profession and perceived the medical profession to be more authoritarian than did Australian nurses. No difference between Australian and British nurses' perceptions of degree of medical autonomy was found. The implications of nurses' perceived discrepancy in workplace satisfaction between nurses and doctors in the delivery of health care are discussed in terms of the structural barriers created by medical dominance. Recommendations for the training of nurses and the implications of the findings for nurse practitioners are made, together with suggestions for further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7897071     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.21010172.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  8 in total

1.  Has nursing lost its way? Towards an ethos of interdisciplinary practice.

Authors:  M Nolan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-29

2.  Knowledge claims, jurisdictional control and professional status: the case of nurse prescribing.

Authors:  Marieke Kroezen; Liset van Dijk; Peter P Groenewegen; Anneke L Francke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Clinician Perspectives of Barriers to Effective Implementation of a Rapid Response System in an Academic Health Centre: A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  John Rihari-Thomas; Michelle DiGiacomo; Jane Phillips; Phillip Newton; Patricia M Davidson
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2017-08-01

Review 4.  Status of patient safety culture in Arab countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mustafa Elmontsri; Ahmed Almashrafi; Ricky Banarsee; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Formalisation and subordination: a contingency theory approach to optimising primary care teams.

Authors:  Damien Contandriopoulos; Mélanie Perroux; Arnaud Duhoux
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Job satisfaction and its related factors: a questionnaire survey of hospital nurses in Mainland China.

Authors:  Hong Lu; Alison E While; K Louise Barriball
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.837

7.  Power sources among district health managers in Ghana: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Vitalis Bawontuo; Augustine Adomah-Afari; Roger A Atinga; Desmond Kuupiel; Irene Akua Agyepong
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-04-04

8.  Disengaged: a qualitative study of communication and collaboration between physicians and other professions on general internal medicine wards.

Authors:  Merrick Zwarenstein; Kathleen Rice; Lesley Gotlib-Conn; Chris Kenaszchuk; Scott Reeves
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.