Literature DB >> 7896187

Intestinal fistulae formation following pelvic exenteration: a review of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience, 1957-1990.

B Miller1, M Morris, D M Gershenson, C L Levenback, T W Burke.   

Abstract

Intestinal fistulae are an uncommon but serious complication of pelvic exenteration. To characterize factors leading to fistula formation and to define optimal management of this complication, we reviewed 533 cases of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1957 and 1990. Forty-two of those patients developed an intestinal fistula following total (n = 29), anterior (n = 12), or posterior (n = 1) exenteration which was not tumor related. Prior to routine pelvic floor reconstruction, the fistula rate was 16%. With the advent of omental pedicle grafts and gracilis flaps, the rate decreased to 4.5%. The fistulae described included those from the small bowel to the pelvic cavity (n = 15) or the neovagina (n = 8), and from the large bowel to the neovagina (n = 8). Complex fistulae were noted in 11 patients. Early fistulae, those that developed during initial hospitalization, occurred in 25 patients and were mainly related to infectious complications. Twenty-three patients underwent attempted surgical repair of fistulae. Eleven died during their hospitalization of sepsis, recurrent wound complications, or fistula. Late fistulae, those that developed after discharge, occurred in 17 patients and were mainly related to delayed healing. Early and late fistulae did not differ in location. Only two patients with late fistula formation died from complications of therapy. Significant long-term morbidity, however, included short bowel syndrome. Based on our review, we conclude the following: (1) Pelvic floor reconstruction, careful attention to surgical technique and aggressive treatment of infections reduces the risk of early fistula formation; (2) in cases associated with significant infection, treatment should be surgical; and (3) in stable patients, conservative management with hyperalimentation and bowel should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7896187     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  6 in total

1.  Pelvic exenteration in gynecologic oncology: a single institution study over 20 years.

Authors:  T Benn; R A Brooks; Q Zhang; M A Powell; P H Thaker; D G Mutch; I Zighelboim
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Laparoscopic salvage total pelvic exenteration: Is it possible post-chemo-radiotherapy?

Authors:  H Patel; J V Joseph; A Amodeo; K Kothari
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.407

3.  Comparison of immediate surgical outcomes between posterior pelvic exenteration and standard resection for primary rectal cancer: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat; Darin Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Pelvi-perineal flap reconstruction: normal imaging appearances and post-operative complications on cross-sectional imaging.

Authors:  Nyree Griffin; Jeremy Rabouhans; Lee A Grant; Roy L H Ng; David Ross; Paul Roblin; Mark L George
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-02-02

5.  Pelvic Exenteration for Recurrent and Persistent Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Lei Li; Shui-Qing Ma; Xian-Jie Tan; Sen Zhong; Ming Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Outcomes Analysis of Gynecologic Oncologic Reconstruction.

Authors:  Lisa M Block; Emily C Hartmann; Jason King; Saygin Chakmakchy; Timothy King; Michael L Bentz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-01-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.