Literature DB >> 7896178

Racial differences in tumor grade among women with endometrial cancer.

H A Hill1, R J Coates, H Austin, P Correa, S J Robboy, V Chen, L A Click, R J Barrett, J G Boyce, H L Kotz.   

Abstract

Black women with endometrial cancer have more advanced disease and less favorable tumor grade than do white women. This study evaluated whether racial differences in tumor grade could be explained by hormone-related factors and other putative determinants of grade. Subjects included 207 white and 81 black postmenopausal women diagnosed with primary cancer of the uterine corpus between 1985 and 1987. Blacks had poorer tumor grade than whites (odds ratio for FIGO grade 2 versus grade 1 is 1.8; odds ratio for grade 3 versus grade 1 is 2.8). Over 75% of the excess of poorly differentiated tumors versus well-differentiated tumors among blacks could be explained by racial differences in use of replacement estrogens, age at first pregnancy, history of oophorectomy, poverty, stage of disease, use of screening, and access to health care. The most prominent factor was estrogen therapy, which was associated with favorable tumor grade and was used much less frequently by blacks. Although not statistically significant, a moderate racial difference in tumor grade remained after control of the potential explanatory explanatory variables. This may reflect true biologic variation between blacks and whites and may explain, in part, the observation that blacks with endometrial cancer have a worse prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7896178     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  7 in total

1.  Racial differences in surgically staged patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  M L Hicks; W Kim; J Abrams; C C Johnson; A C Blount; G P Parham
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Double-robust estimation of an exposure-outcome odds ratio adjusting for confounding in cohort and case-control studies.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Endometrial cancer: socioeconomic status and racial/ethnic differences in stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival.

Authors:  Terri Madison; David Schottenfeld; Sherman A James; Ann G Schwartz; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Obesity in relation to endometrial cancer risk and disease characteristics in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Katherine W Reeves; Gebra Cuyun Carter; Rebecca J Rodabough; Dorothy Lane; S Gene McNeeley; Marcia L Stefanick; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Differences between black and white patients with cancer of the uterine corpus in interval from symptom recognition to initial medical consultation (United States).

Authors:  R J Coates; L A Click; L C Harlan; S Robboy; R J Barrett; J W Eley; P Reynolds; V W Chen; W A Darity; R S Blacklow; B K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Changing Incidence of Uterine Cancer in Rural Egypt: Possible Impact of Nutritional and Epidemiologic Transitions.

Authors:  Saad Alshahrani; Ahmed Hablas; Robert M Chamberlain; Jane Meza; Steven Remmenga; Ibrahim A Seifeldin; Mohamed Ramadan; Amr S Soliman
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-07

7.  The Geographic Context of Racial Disparities in Aggressive Endometrial Cancer Subtypes: Integrating Social and Environmental Aspects to Discern Biological Outcomes.

Authors:  Anna Kimberly Miller; Jennifer Catherine Gordon; Jacqueline W Curtis; Jayakrishnan Ajayakumar; Fredrick R Schumacher; Stefanie Avril
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.