Literature DB >> 7896014

Immunologic stimulation of T lymphocytes by silica after use of silicone mammary implants.

D L Smalley1, D R Shanklin, M F Hall, M V Stevens, A Hanissian.   

Abstract

Difficulties in showing the biologic activity of silicones in vitro have contributed to the controversy over effects of silicone mammary implants in vivo. We adapted a standard lymphocyte stimulation test to detect evidence of cellular immunity in patients with silicone gel implants. Initially, lymphocytes were harvested from 70 implant patients, 76 normal controls without implants or symptoms, and 18 patients with classic rheumatic disorders and without a history of silicone implants. The harvested lymphocytes were stimulated with PWM, PHA, Con A, and pharmaceutical grade colloidal silicon dioxide (silica). Implant patients showed increased SI compared to controls and those with rheumatic disorders. The mean SI of implant patients was 195.0 +/- 19.3, 18-fold that of normal controls (< 0.0001). Patients with rheumatic disease showed the same SI as controls (P = 0.3577). A follow-up study included 220 normal controls without implants, 942 silicone gel implant patients with demonstrable rheumatic symptoms, and 34 implant patients without symptoms at the time of the study. The average SI for the 220 normal controls was 10.0 +/- 0.41. Among the symptomatic implant women, 860 (91.3%) had SI significantly above those of the normal controls. Of these, 171 (18.2%) had SI between 25 and 50, 316 (33.5%) had SI between 50 and 100, and 373 (39.6%) had SI over 100. The data presented confirms that silicone implant patients respond immunologically to the silicon dioxide contained in mammary prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7896014     DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.9.5.7896014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.191


  5 in total

1.  Elevated concentrations of interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in plasma of women with silicone breast implants.

Authors:  E A Ojo-Amaize; O J Lawless; J B Peter
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1996-05

Review 2.  Risk of rheumatic disease in breast implant users: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Sabrina Hoa; Kathleen Milord; Marie Hudson; Stephen C Nicolaidis; Josiane Bourré-Tessier
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-08

Review 3.  The immunopathology of siliconosis. History, clinical presentation, and relation to silicosis and the chemistry of silicon and silicone.

Authors:  D R Shanklin; D L Smalley
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 4.  Capsular contracture by silicone breast implants: possible causes, biocompatibility, and prophylactic strategies.

Authors:  Andreas E Steiert; Maria Boyce; Heiko Sorg
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2013-12-02

5.  Effects of visible implanted elastomer marking on physiological traits of frogs.

Authors:  Rachael E Antwis; Rebecca Purcell; Susan L Walker; Andrea L Fidgett; Richard F Preziosi
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.079

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.