Literature DB >> 7895965

How much ulcer is ulcer-like? Diagnostic determinants of peptic ulcer in open access gastroscopy.

M E Numans1, Y Van der Graaf, N J de Wit, F Touw-Otten, R A de Melker.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional diagnostic prevalence study was carried out within a multi-centre experiment with open access gastroscopy in Utrecht, The Netherlands. The objective of the study was to contribute to improvement of patient selection for open access gastroscopy and to evaluate diagnostic determinants for peptic ulcer. Data were analysed in all 861 patients who were consecutively newly referred during the experiment to undergo gastrocopy. Patient characteristics and outcomes of gastroscopies were recorded. Univariate and multivariate (logistic) analyses were carried out and the results were evaluated with ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis. The most important clinical characteristics to be used for prediction of peptic ulcer are pain on an empty stomach, absence of pain after a meal and absence of obstructive complaints. The scoring list derived from the full model, comprising these characteristics together with age, sex, information on former dyspeptic diseases, medication and smoking ('basic characteristics'), predicted peptic ulcer with an AUC of 0.78. The 'ulcer-like' model, with characteristics known from the literature, had an AUC of 0.76. The amount of gastroscopy requests on patients suspected of a peptic ulcer could have been reduced from 60 to 44%. Forcing 'basic characteristics' into scoring lists on peptic ulcer improved the pre-diagnostic test capacities. The presented scoring list may improve gastroscopy requesting by GPs aiming at finding peptic ulcers. Practical manageability of the list should be prospectively evaluated in future experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7895965     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  5 in total

1.  Testing for Helicobacter pylori in dyspeptic patients. Did paper have statistical discrepancies?

Authors:  A Jacobs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-03

2.  Testing for Helicobacter pylori in dyspeptic patients suspected of peptic ulcer disease in primary care: cross sectional study.

Authors:  C F Weijnen; M E Numans; N J de Wit; A J Smout; K G Moons; T J Verheij; A W Hoes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-14

3.  A randomised controlled trial of four management strategies for dyspepsia: relationships between symptom subgroups and strategy outcome.

Authors:  N T Lewin van den Broek; M E Numans; E Buskens; T J Verheij; N J de Wit; A J Smout
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  In-practice evaluation of whole-blood Helicobacter pylori test: its usefulness in detecting peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  A O Quartero; M E Numans; R A de Melker; N J de Wit
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  [Clinical practice guideline on the management of patients with dyspepsia. Update 2012].

Authors:  Javier P Gisbert; Xavier Calvet; Juan Ferrándiz; Juan Mascort; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Mercè Marzo
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 1.137

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.