Literature DB >> 7895351

Relation among stenosis severity, myocardial blood flow, and flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease.

M Di Carli1, J Czernin, C K Hoh, V H Gerbaudo, R C Brunken, S C Huang, M E Phelps, H R Schelbert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary arteriography is considered the "gold standard" for evaluating the severity of a coronary stenosis. Because the resistance to blood flow through a stenotic lesion depends on a number of lesion characteristics, the physiological significance of coronary lesions of intermediate severity is often difficult to determine from angiography alone. This study of patients with coronary artery disease seeks to determine the relation between myocardial blood flow and flow reserve measured by positron emission tomography (PET) and the percent area stenosis on quantitative coronary arteriography. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 28 subjects: 18 patients with coronary artery disease (66 +/- 8 years) and 10 age-matched healthy volunteers (64 +/- 13 years) with dynamic N-13 ammonia PET imaging at rest and after dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg). The percent cross-sectional area stenosis was quantified on the coronary arteriograms as described by Brown et al. In the 18 patients, a total of 41 non-infarct-related coronary vessels were analyzed. Myocardial blood flows in normal regions of patients with coronary artery disease were not different than those in healthy volunteers, both at rest and after dipyridamole. As a result, the myocardial flow reserve was also similar in both groups (2.4 +/- 0.4 versus 2.6 +/- 0.7, respectively; P = NS). Quantitative PET estimates of hyperemic blood flow (r = .81, P < .00001), flow reserve (r = .78, P < .00001), and an index of the "minimal coronary resistance" (r = .78, P < .00001) were inversely and nonlinearly correlated with the percent area stenosis on angiography. Of note, PET estimates of myocardial flow reserve successfully differentiated coronary lesions of intermediate severity (50% to 70% and 70% to 90%; 2.4 +/- 0.4 versus 1.8 +/- 0.5, respectively; P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with coronary artery disease, non-invasive measurements of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve by PET are inversely and nonlinearly related to stenosis severity as defined by quantitative angiography. Importantly, coronary lesions of intermediate severity have a differential flow reserve that decreases as stenosis increases that can be detected noninvasively by PET, thus allowing better definition of the functional importance of known coronary stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7895351     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  92 in total

1.  Lake Tahoe invitation meeting 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Non-invasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences.

Authors:  Aaron So; Gerald Wisenberg; Ali Islam; Justin Amann; Walter Romano; James Brown; Dennis Humen; George Jablonsky; Jian-Ying Li; Jiang Hsieh; Ting-Yim Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Assessment of coronary flow reserve and microcirculation: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Roxana Campisi; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Advances in clinical application of quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Juhani Knuuti; Antti Saraste
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  [Arterial hypertension in patients with coronary artery disease].

Authors:  T Graf; H Schunkert
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 6.  PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality?

Authors:  Antti Saraste; Sami Kajander; Chunlei Han; Sergey V Nesterov; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  The clinical utility of assessing myocardial blood flow using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Maria Cecilia Ziadi; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Reasons and implications of agreements and disagreements between coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Mahsaw Motlagh; Anuj Gupta; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Integrated imaging of cardiac anatomy, physiology, and viability.

Authors:  James A Arrighi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Federico E Mordini; Tariq Haddad; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Tracy B Lowrey; Anthony H Aletras; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.