Literature DB >> 7894638

Reliability of standard foot radiographic measurements.

C L Saltzman1, E A Brandser, K S Berbaum, L DeGnore, J R Holmes, D A Katcherian, R D Teasdall, I J Alexander.   

Abstract

Fifty standing dorsoplantar and lateral foot radiographs were obtained on a consecutive series of patients seen in an orthopaedic foot and ankle clinic. These radiographs were duplicated, and eight common foot measurements were made on each pair by six experienced examiners. Measurements were made in two ways: first by a subjective visual assessment, and second by quantitative evaluation made according to strictly defined criteria. All measurements were made under controlled, ideal conditions with similar high quality goniometers. The results demonstrated overall greater reliability in the quantitative methods than the non-quantitative methods. For each of the quantitative techniques, a cumulated frequency distribution of differences between examiners was calculated. The approximate 95% bounds for these measures were: hallux-metatarsophalangeal angle = 6 degrees, first intermetatarsal angle = 4 degrees, metatarsophalangeal-5 angle = 11 degrees, fourth intermetatarsal angle = 4 degrees, AP talocalcaneal angle = 20 degrees, lateral talocalcaneal angle = 12 degrees, sesamoid station = 2 grades, and forefoot width = 5 mm. Physicians using these parameters to make decisions regarding patient care and clinical outcomes need to keep in mind these potential errors in making foot radiographic measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7894638     DOI: 10.1177/107110079401501206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  22 in total

1.  Diagnostic validity of alternative manual stress radiographic technique detecting subtalar instability with concomitant ankle instability.

Authors:  Byung Hoon Lee; Kyung-Hwa Choi; Dong Yeon Seo; Sang Min Choi; Gab Lae Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A minimally invasive technique for surgical treatment of hallux valgus: simple, effective, rapid, inexpensive (SERI).

Authors:  Sandro Giannini; Cesare Faldini; Matteo Nanni; Alberto Di Martino; Deianira Luciani; Francesca Vannini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Choosing among 3 ankle-foot orthoses for a patient with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher G Neville; Jeff R Houck
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Does alignment in the hindfoot radiograph influence dynamic foot-floor pressures in ankle and tibiotalocalcaneal fusion?

Authors:  Arno Frigg; Benno Nigg; Elysia Davis; Beth Pederson; V Valderrabano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: assessments and treatment options.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Jody L Riskowski; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  Radiographic correlates of hallux valgus severity in older people.

Authors:  Paul R D'Arcangelo; Karl B Landorf; Shannon E Munteanu; Gerard V Zammit; Hylton B Menz
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Effects of positioning on radiographic measurements of ankle morphology: a computerized tomography-based simulation study.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Kuo; Hsuan-Lun Lu; Tung-Wu Lu; Cheng-Chung Lin; Alberto Leardini; Mei-Ying Kuo; Horng-Chaung Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Geometry of the Proximal Phalanx of Hallux and First Metatarsal Bone to Predict Hallux Abducto Valgus: A Radiological Study.

Authors:  Eduardo Perez Boal; Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo; Miguel Fuentes Rodriguez; Daniel Lopez Lopez; Marta Elena Losa Iglesias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prediction of peak pressure from clinical and radiological measurements in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Nick A Guldemond; Pieter Leffers; Geert H I M Walenkamp; Nicolaas C Schaper; Antal P Sanders; Fred H M Nieman; Lodewijk W van Rhijn
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 2.763

10.  A comparison of hallux valgus angles assessed with computerised plantar pressure measurements, clinical examination and radiography in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Daniël Mc Janssen; Antal P Sanders; Nick A Guldemond; Joris Hermus; Geert Him Walenkamp; Lodewijk W van Rhijn
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.