Literature DB >> 7894318

Approaches to the development and marketing approval of drugs that prevent cancer.

G J Kelloff1, J R Johnson, J A Crowell, C W Boone, J J DeGeorge, V E Steele, M U Mehta, J W Temeck, W J Schmidt, G Burke.   

Abstract

The broad concept of chemoprevention applies to the prevention of clinical cancer by the administration of chemical agents. Current approaches to the development and marketing approval of drugs to prevent cancer are described by a Working Group from the National Cancer Institute and the Food and Drug Administration. A strategy is presented that identifies candidate drugs, with examples that illustrate how drugs are characterized for efficacy through in vitro transformation modulation and mechanistic assays, and in vivo tumor modulation models of carcinogenesis. Requirements and recommendations for safety evaluation in toxicology testing are given, and the evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug effects and potential surrogate end point biomarkers in Phase I trials are discussed. Appropriate subject populations are identified. Phase II trials should emphasize the evaluation of surrogate end point biomarkers that are highly correlated with cancer incidence and may serve as an estimate of cancer incidence reduction. In Phase III trials the interim analysis of a validated surrogate end point of cancer incidence may facilitate timely and cost-effective marketing of efficacious drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7894318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers as surrogates for cancer development.

Authors:  E Hawk; J L Viner; J A Lawrence
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Regulatory approval of cancer risk-reducing (chemopreventive) drugs: moving what we have learned into the clinic.

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens; Gregory A Curt; Dean E Brenner; Gary Gordon; Ronald B Herberman; Olivera Finn; Gary J Kelloff; Samir N Khleif; Caroline C Sigman; Eva Szabo
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-03

Review 3.  Evolving strategies for prostate cancer chemoprevention trials.

Authors:  Ronald Lieberman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Extracting the Benefit of Nexrutine® for Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Suleman S Hussain; Darpan Patel; Rita Ghosh; Addanki P Kumar
Journal:  Curr Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2015-03-21

Review 5.  Perspectives in cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  G D Stoner; M A Morse; G J Kelloff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Possible chemopreventive effects of bovine lactoferrin on esophagus and lung carcinogenesis in the rat.

Authors:  Y Ushida; K Sekine; T Kuhara; N Takasuka; M Iigo; M Maeda; H Tsuda
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1999-03

Review 7.  Cancer chemoprevention: a rapidly evolving field.

Authors:  W P Steward; K Brown
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Pioglitazone Reduces Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development in Two Rodent Models of Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Shen Li; Sarani Ghoshal; Mozhdeh Sojoodi; Gunisha Arora; Ricard Masia; Derek J Erstad; Michael Lanuti; Yujin Hoshida; Thomas F Baumert; Kenneth K Tanabe; Bryan C Fuchs
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.