Literature DB >> 7894222

Prospective randomized clinical study in general surgery comparing a new low molecular weight heparin with unfractionated heparin in the prevention of thrombosis.

J Limmer1, D Ellbrück, H Müller, E Eisele, J Rist, F Schütze, H Beger, H Heimpel, E Seifried.   

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed comparing the antithrombotic efficacy of the low molecular weight heparin LMWH 21-23, (Braun) with an unfractionated heparin in elective general surgical patients over an observation period of 7 postoperative days. A total of 230 patients were admitted: 103 (group I) received low molecular weight heparin and 100 (group II) low-dose unfractionated heparin treatment given subcutaneously. In group I 41 patients (46%) were operated on for malignant disease and in group II 54 patients (54%). Due to the large amount of great abdominal procedures the intra- and perioperative application of hydroxyethyl starch was allowed for volume substitution. None of the patients died due to fatal pulmonary embolism. In group I four patients revealed positive 125I-labeled fibrinogen uptake (3.9%); two patients belonged to the hydroxyethyl starch subgroup. In group II five patients displayed a positive fibrinogen uptake (5%); two belonged to the hydroxyethyl starch subgroup. The results of the hemostaseological investigations (e.g., prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin clotting time, fibrinogen, antithrombin III, protein C, plasminogen, alpha 2-antiplasmin, tissue-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor) revealed no statistically significant differences between groups I and II or their subgroups, although a tendency to prolonged clotting times was observed. The antifactor Xa activity values, however, displayed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The antifactor Xa activity measured up to 0.16 U/ml for the low molecular weight heparin (group I) and 0.05 U/ml for the unfractionated heparin (group II) in the postoperative period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7894222     DOI: 10.1007/bf00190751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Investig        ISSN: 0941-0198


  28 in total

Review 1.  Review of clinical trials of low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  D Bergqvist
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1992-02

Review 2.  Fibrinogen uptake test for detection of deep vein thrombosis--a review of current practice.

Authors:  V V Kakkar
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis by low-dose heparin in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

Authors:  G K Morris; A P Henry; B J Preston
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-10-05       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Dextran 70 in prophylaxis of thromboembolic disease after surgery: a clinically oriented randomized double-blind trial.

Authors:  A Kline; L E Hughes; H Campbell; A Williams; J Zlosnick; K G Leach
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-04-19

5.  Deep vein thrombosis of the leg. Is there a "high risk" group?

Authors:  V V Kakkar; C T Howe; A N Nicolaides; J T Renney; M B Clarke
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  V V Kakkar; M D Stringer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Low-molecular-weight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M T Nurmohamed; F R Rosendaal; H R Büller; E Dekker; D W Hommes; J P Vandenbroucke; E Briët
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-18       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Low molecular weight heparin (KABI 2165) as thromboprophylaxis in elective visceral surgery. A randomized, double-blind study versus unfractionated heparin.

Authors:  M Koller; U Schoch; P Buchmann; F Largiadèr; A von Felten; P G Frick
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1986-12-15       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Low molecular weight heparin compared with unfractionated heparin in prevention of postoperative thrombosis.

Authors:  M Samama; P Bernard; J P Bonnardot; S Combe-Tamzali; Y Lanson; E Tissot
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Rates of venous thrombosis after general surgery: combined results of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  G A Colditz; R L Tuden; G Oster
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-07-19       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients.

Authors:  David R Anderson; Gian Paolo Morgano; Carole Bennett; Francesco Dentali; Charles W Francis; David A Garcia; Susan R Kahn; Maryam Rahman; Anita Rajasekhar; Frederick B Rogers; Maureen A Smythe; Kari A O Tikkinen; Adolph J Yates; Tejan Baldeh; Sara Balduzzi; Jan L Brożek; Itziar Etxeandia- Ikobaltzeta; Herman Johal; Ignacio Neumann; Wojtek Wiercioch; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Holger J Schünemann; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-12-10

Review 2.  Anticoagulation for perioperative thromboprophylaxis in people with cancer.

Authors:  Charbel F Matar; Lara A Kahale; Maram B Hakoum; Ibrahim G Tsolakian; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Victor Ed Yosuico; Irene Terrenato; Francesca Sperati; Maddalena Barba; Holger Schünemann; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.