Literature DB >> 7892843

A randomized multicenter trial assessing a home uterine activity monitoring device used in the absence of daily nursing contact.

R J Wapner1, D B Cotton, R Artal, R J Librizzi, M G Ross.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of home uterine activity monitoring in the early detection of preterm labor among women with a history of preterm delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: Two hundred eighteen women from four centers were prospectively randomized to routine high-risk prenatal care alone (not monitored) or to the same prenatal care with twice-daily home uterine activity monitoring without daily nursing support (monitored). All women had a history of preterm delivery. The primary study end point was cervical status as measured by cervical dilatation at the time of diagnosis of preterm labor.
RESULTS: The two study group populations at entry into the study were similar in medical and demographic characteristics. Of 187 women completing the trial, 21 (24.4%) of the women in the monitored group (n = 86) and 22 (21.8%) of the women in the unmonitored (control) group (n = 101) experienced preterm labor (not significant). Mean cervical dilatation at the time of diagnosis of preterm labor was 1.7 cm in the monitored group and 2.8 cm in the unmonitored group (p = 0.004). A total of 52.4% of the women in the monitored group had a cervical dilatation of < 2 cm when preterm labor was detected, compared with 18.2% of the women in the unmonitored group (p = 0.019). The median duration of gestation after diagnosis of preterm labor was 21.0 days for the monitored group and 3.0 days for the unmonitored group (p = 0.016).
CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of preterm labor for women using home uterine activity monitoring without daily nursing contact was detected with less cervical dilatation than found in those women not monitored. This earlier detection of preterm labor demonstrates the utility and effectiveness of home uterine activity monitoring devices and may lead to improved neonatal outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7892843     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90038-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  A randomized trial of nurse specialist home care for women with high-risk pregnancies: outcomes and costs.

Authors:  D Brooten; J M Youngblut; L Brown; S A Finkler; D F Neff; E Madigan
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 2.  Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour.

Authors:  Christine Urquhart; Rosemary Currell; Francoise Harlow; Liz Callow
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-15

Review 3.  Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo da Fonseca; George Creasy; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Telemonitoring in Obstetrics: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Dorien Lanssens; Thijs Vandenberk; Inge M Thijs; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Midwives', Obstetricians', and Recently Delivered Mothers' Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey.

Authors:  Dorien Lanssens; Thijs Vandenberk; Joy Lodewijckx; Tessa Peeters; Valerie Storms; Inge M Thijs; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Prenatal Remote Monitoring of Women With Gestational Hypertensive Diseases: Cost Analysis.

Authors:  Dorien Lanssens; Thijs Vandenberk; Christophe Jp Smeets; Hélène De Cannière; Sharona Vonck; Jade Claessens; Yenthel Heyrman; Dominique Vandijck; Valerie Storms; Inge M Thijs; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.