Literature DB >> 7892477

Communication of mammography results to women by radiologists: attitudes of referring health care providers.

L W Bassett1, K Bomyea, S Liu, J Sayre.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand the attitudes of referring physicians about the communication of mammography results directly to women by radiologists.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to 87 health care providers (85 physicians and two nurse practitioners) who regularly refer women to the authors' mammographic facility. Responses were answered by assigning a score of 1-5 (strongly agree to strongly disagree).
RESULTS: Seventy-one (82%) referring providers responded to the survey. For normal results, 85% agreed that radiologists should report directly to women; for abnormal results, 58% agreed. For a radiologist to send a written report directly to women, 75% agreed for normal results and 73% for abnormal results. For follow-up reminders, 67% agreed the radiologist should do it, 25% agreed both the radiologist and referring physician should be both responsible, and 8% agreed the referring physician should do it.
CONCLUSION: Referring physicians were receptive to the direct communication of mammography results to women by radiologists. Use of this type of survey is recommended for radiologists planning to change their communication protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7892477     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.195.1.7892477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Preferences of referring physicians regarding the role of radiologists as direct communicators of test results.

Authors:  Nuri Erdoğan; Hakan İmamoğlu; Süreyya Burcu Görkem; Serap Doğan; Serkan Şenol; Ahmet Öztürk
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Reviewing imaging examination results with a radiologist immediately after study completion: patient preferences and assessment of feasibility in an academic department.

Authors:  Jay Pahade; Corey Couto; Roger B Davis; Payal Patel; Bettina Siewert; Max P Rosen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  How often do patients ask for the results of their radiological studies?

Authors:  Enrico Capaccio; Andrea Podestà; Daniele Morcaldi; Maria Pia Sormani; Lorenzo Egildo Derchi
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-01-28

4.  Doctor-patient relationship in oncologic radiology.

Authors:  L Ollivier; J Leclère; S Dolbeault; S Neuenschwander
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Patient experiences and preferences: development of practice guidelines in a cancer imaging department.

Authors:  L Ollivier; F Apiou; J Leclère; M Sévellec; B Asselain; A Brédart; S Neuenschwander
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.