Literature DB >> 7892024

Quantitative sensory examination of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in man: effects of pre- and post-traumatic morphine on hyperalgesia.

Jannick Brennum1, Jørgen B Dahl, Steen Møiniche, Lars Arendt-Nielsen.   

Abstract

The objectives of the study were: (1) comparison of hypoalgesic effects of pre- and post-traumatic epidural morphine (EM) on primary and secondary hyperalgesia, and (2) comparison of EM hypoalgesia in normal and injured skin. Burn injuries (25 x 50 mm rectangular thermode, 47 degrees C, 7 min) were produced on the calves of healthy volunteers, at 2 different days at least 1 week apart. In randomized order, the subjects received 4 mg of EM administered via the L2-L3 intervertebral space on one day and no treatment on the other day. One calf was injured 30 min prior to and the other calf 2.5 h after administration of morphine. Hence, the calf injured prior to morphine administration was a model of postinjury treatment, and the calf injured after morphine administration, a model of pretraumatic treatment. The timing of injuries was identical on the morphine treatment and control days. The injuries induced decrease in heat pain detection and tolerance thresholds within the area of injury (area of primary hyperalgesia) as well as reduction of areas of allodynia for brush and pinprick surrounding the injury (area of secondary hyperalgesia). Both pre- and post-traumatic administration of EM increased heat pain detection and tolerance thresholds, and decreased by approximately 50% the areas of secondary hyperalgesia 2.5 h postinjury. The effects of morphine were naloxone (NAL)-reversible (0.1 mg/kg, i.v.). There was no significant difference between pre- and post-traumatic administration of morphine on the effect of either primary or secondary hyperalgesia. EM increased the heat pain detection threshold more within the injury than at a corresponding non-injured site. There was no significant difference in the effect of morphine on heat pain tolerance in injured and non-injured skin. Following NAL, the areas of secondary hyperalgesia expanded beyond control size. It is suggested that the major effect of EM on secondary hyperalgesia is inhibition of C fibre-mediated activity which maintains the altered response properties of central neurons responsible for secondary hyperalgesia. Possible mechanisms of action of NAL in enhancement of hyperalgesia are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7892024     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90079-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  10 in total

1.  Demarcation of secondary hyperalgesia zones: Punctate stimulation pressure matters.

Authors:  Thomas K Ringsted; Casper Enghuus; Morten A Petersen; Mads U Werner
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  A simple contact heat experimental pain model for evaluation of analgesic agents in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Reddy Khambam; Madireddy Umamaheshwar Rao Naidu; Pingali Usha Rani; Takallapalli Ramesh Kumar Rao
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2011-12

3.  Effect of Intravenous Alfentanil on Nonpainful Thermally Induced Hyperalgesia in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Carolyn Schifftner; Gery Schulteis; Mark S Wallace
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  Can coadministration of oxycodone and morphine produce analgesic synergy in humans? An experimental cold pain study.

Authors:  Michael Grach; Wattan Massalha; Dorit Pud; Rivka Adler; Elon Eisenberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  A simple thermal pain model for the evaluation of analgesic activity in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Reddy Khambam; Mur Naidu; P Usha Rani; T Ramesh Kumar Rao
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04

6.  A comparison of ketamine and paracetamol for preventing remifentanil induced hyperalgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Naime Yalcin; Sema Tuncer Uzun; Ruhiye Reisli; Hale Borazan; Seref Otelcioglu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Differential Classical Conditioning of the Nocebo Effect: Increasing Heat-Pain Perception without Verbal Suggestions.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Bräscher; Dieter Kleinböhl; Rupert Hölzl; Susanne Becker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-13

8.  The improved quality of postoperative analgesia after intrathecal morphine does not result in improved recovery and quality of life in the first 6 months after orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Nilufar Foadi; Matthias Karst; Anika Frese-Gaul; Niels Rahe-Meyer; Stefan Krömer; Christian Weilbach
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Morphine- and buprenorphine-induced analgesia and antihyperalgesia in a human inflammatory pain model: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, five-arm crossover study.

Authors:  Pernille Ravn; Erik L Secher; Ulrik Skram; Trine Therkildsen; Lona L Christrup; Mads U Werner
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Designing and conducting proof-of-concept chronic pain analgesic clinical trials.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Ian Gilron; Tina Doshi; Srinivasa Raja
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-02-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.