Literature DB >> 7891377

The impact of genetic counselling on females in fragile X families.

G Curtis1, N Dennis, J MacPherson.   

Abstract

We report a retrospective study over the period 1981-1992 of the reproductive histories of 27 women, from 21 families, who were known or possible fragile X carriers. Eighteen women had cytogenetic and DNA linkage studies to establish their carrier risk. They subsequently received definitive carrier status information following the cloning of the gene in 1991. The remaining nine women had cytogenetic and mutation studies only. For 11 of the women their carrier risk was modified over the 11 year period. The results suggest that these women at risk of having a son with fragile X have carefully considered their reproductive choices. Three of the six women who were initially sterilised have had, or are awaiting, a reversal of sterilisation following clarification of their carrier status. There were 10 pregnancies to 10 women. Seven of the pregnancies were to women at "high" (40-100%) risk of being a carrier, and in this group only one woman chose to continue the pregnancy without prenatal diagnosis. Three pregnancies were to women at "medium" or "low" (< 39%) risk of being a carrier. None of the three chose prenatal diagnosis and one affected male was born to this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7891377      PMCID: PMC1016696          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.31.12.950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  8 in total

1.  Reproductive choices in couples at risk for genetic disease: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Authors:  R D'Amico; G Jacopini; G Vivona; M Frontali
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1992

2.  Fragile X genotype characterized by an unstable region of DNA.

Authors:  S Yu; M Pritchard; E Kremer; M Lynch; J Nancarrow; E Baker; K Holman; J C Mulley; S T Warren; D Schlessinger
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Genetic counseling--the postcounseling period: I. Parents' perceptions of uncertainty.

Authors:  A Lippman-Hand; F C Fraser
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1979

4.  Preventive screening for the fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  G Turner; H Robinson; S Laing; S Purvis-Smith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox.

Authors:  Y H Fu; D P Kuhl; A Pizzuti; M Pieretti; J S Sutcliffe; S Richards; A J Verkerk; J J Holden; R G Fenwick; S T Warren
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-12-20       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Factors influencing the reproductive decision after genetic counseling.

Authors:  P G Frets; H J Duivenvoorden; F Verhage; M F Niermeijer; S M van de Berge; H Galjaard
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1990-04

7.  Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. IV. The subjective assessment of probability.

Authors:  S Kessler; E K Levine
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1987-10

8.  Population incidence and segregation ratios in the Martin-Bell syndrome.

Authors:  T P Webb; S E Bundey; A I Thake; J Todd
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Attitude of medical school students in China towards genetic testing and counseling issues in FXS.

Authors:  Jia Li; Wen Huang; Shiyu Luo; Yunting Lin; Ranhui Duan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.