Literature DB >> 7890790

Revision hip arthroplasty with the use of cement and impaction grafting. Histological analysis of four cases.

R G Nelissen1, T W Bauer, L R Weidenhielm, D P LeGolvan, W E Mikhail.   

Abstract

The findings of radiographic studies have suggested that the cementing of an implant with a polished tapered stem into a bed of impacted bone allograft may provide adequate function of the joint and may restore bone in the proximal part of the femur. However, radiographs of hips with cancellous bone graft adjacent to cement are difficult to interpret, and the viability of impacted bone graft that is adjacent to cement and its capability for remodeling are unclear. To evaluate this interface further, we obtained biopsy specimens from the proximal part of the femur at the time of removal of trochanteric wires from four patients eleven to twenty-seven months after revision hip arthroplasty with cement and impaction grafting. Three relatively ill defined zones were identified histologically: an inner zone consisting of bone cement, fibrous tissue, and partially necrotic trabeculae with evidence of bone-remodeling; a middle zone consisting of viable trabecular bone and probable formation of so-called neocortex with fewer particles of bone cement; and an outer zone consisting of viable cortex. Fibrous tissue was present around some of the incorporating fragments of bone graft, but no continuous fibrous membrane was seen. Particles of cement were identified, but no polyethylene debris was visible on examination with light microscopy. The results demonstrated remodeling of bone and at least partial restoration of bone stock in the proximal part of the femur after revision arthroplasty with cement and impaction grafting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7890790     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199503000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  12 in total

1.  Determination of mechanical properties of impacted human morsellized cancellous allografts for revision joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Y Tanabe; T Wakui; A Kobayashi; H Ohashi; Y Kadoya; Y Yamano
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  No effect of platelet-rich plasma with frozen or processed bone allograft around noncemented implants.

Authors:  T B Jensen; O Rahbek; S Overgaard; K Søballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Acetabular revision with freeze-dried irradiated and chemically treated allograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up of 17 cases.

Authors:  Bernardo Vargas; Jacques Caton
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Factors influencing the stability of stems fixed with impaction graft in vitro.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Ohashi; Masanori Matsuura; Tsuneyuki Ebara; Yusaku Okamoto; Hironori Kou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Nine-year results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacement.

Authors:  E Drampalos; A Fadulelmola; R Mohammed; D Shaw; S Subramanian; K D Jain; J Hodgkinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Impaction allograft with cement for the revision of the femoral component. A minimum 39-month follow-up study with the use of the Exeter stem in Asian hips.

Authors:  Soo-Jae Yim; Min-Young Kim; You-Sung Suh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The combined effect of parathyroid hormone and bone graft on implant fixation.

Authors:  H Daugaard; B Elmengaard; T T Andreassen; J Baas; J E Bechtold; K Soballe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-01

8.  Crack revision improves fixation of uncemented HA-coated implants compared with reaming: an experiment in dogs.

Authors:  Jorgen Baas; Brian Elmengaard; Thomas Jakobsen; Joan Bechtold; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Femoral revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished tapered stem.

Authors:  I C Heyligers; B W Schreurs; E H van Haaren
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 1.154

10.  Osteogenic scaffolds for bone reconstruction.

Authors:  Ling-Jiang Li; Ning Liu; Jian-Gang Shi; Qing Liu; Lian-Shun Jia; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2012-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.