Literature DB >> 7889957

Comparative microbiological activity and pharmacokinetics of cefprozil.

R Wise1.   

Abstract

In vitro studies on the activity of cefprozil have been conducted in Europe and North America. Against gram-negative bacilli, cefprozil and cefaclor are at least two to four times more active than cephalexin. Cefixime is more active against these organisms. Against gram-positive cocci, cefprozil is at least two to four times more active than cefaclor and cephalexin; cefixime has limited gram-positive activity, and is particularly inactive against staphylococci (MIC90 32 mg/l). Cefprozil is highly active against Streptococcus pneumoniae (unlike cefixime). Those strains of this genus that display intermediate resistance to pneumococci are more susceptible to cefprozil than cefaclor. Neisseria species and Moraxella catarrhalis are susceptible to cefprozil (MIC90 0.06 and 1 mg/l). beta-lactamase-producing strains of Haemophilus influenzae appear to be susceptible to cefprozil, as the reported MIC90 is 2-4 mg/l. Enterococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and those strains of the Enterobacteriaceae that commonly possess a chromosomal cephalosporinase (e.g., Providencia, Morganella and Enterobacter) are generally considered to be resistant to cefprozil as well as to other oral cephalosporins. Cefprozil appears to display enhanced stability to the commonly encountered Tem-1 and SHV-1 plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases, as found in Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and the Enterobacteriaceae. Cefprozil is rapidly absorbed, reaching a maximum concentration 0.9 to 1.2 h post-dose. Following oral doses of 250 and 500 mg, the Cmax is 6.2 and 10.0 mg/l respectively. Serum half-lives are generally reported as between 1.2 and 1.4 h, and urine recovery is high, 57-70%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7889957     DOI: 10.1007/bf02111350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  17 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of cefprozil in infants and children.

Authors:  X Sáez-Llorens; W C Shyu; S Shelton; H Kumiesz; J Nelson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of cefprozil.

Authors:  K Nye; P O'Neill; J M Andrews; R Wise
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefprozil and its impact on intestinal flora of volunteers.

Authors:  H Lode; C Müller; K Borner; C E Nord; P Koeppe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of the oral cephalosporin BMY-28100.

Authors:  M Hiraoka; S Masuyoshi; K Tomatsu; M Inoue; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Comparative antibacterial activity of the new oral cephalosporin BMY-28100.

Authors:  F H Kayser
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Comparative antibacterial activity of a new oral cephalosporin, BMY-28100.

Authors:  N X Chin; H C Neu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of the effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil and cefaclor.

Authors:  R H Barbhaiya; U A Shukla; C R Gleason; W C Shyu; K A Pittman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The in-vitro activity of a new highly active quinolone, DU-6859a.

Authors:  A Jolley; J M Andrews; N Brenwald; R Wise
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  In vitro and in vivo evaluations of BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin.

Authors:  K Tomatsu; S Ando; S Masuyoshi; S Kondo; M Hirano; T Miyaki; H Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Effect of antacid on the bioavailability of cefprozil.

Authors:  W C Shyu; R B Wilber; K A Pittman; R H Barbhaiya
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  6 in total

1.  A study to determine the pharmacokinetics and inflammatory fluid penetration of two doses of a solid formulation of the hexetil prodrug of a trinem, sanfetrinem (GV 104326).

Authors:  R Wise; J M Andrews; L Da Ros; J Child; D Mortiboy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Cefprozil: a review.

Authors:  Sumit Bhargava; Rakesh Lodha; S K Kabra
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 3.  Redefining the management of pediatric tonsillopharyngitis with cefprozil.

Authors:  Nameet Jerath; Ganesh Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of newer oral cephalosporins: implications for treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  M Cazzola; M G Matera; C F Donner
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  The initial state of the human gut microbiome determines its reshaping by antibiotics.

Authors:  Frédéric Raymond; Amin A Ouameur; Maxime Déraspe; Naeem Iqbal; Hélène Gingras; Bédis Dridi; Philippe Leprohon; Pier-Luc Plante; Richard Giroux; Ève Bérubé; Johanne Frenette; Dominique K Boudreau; Jean-Luc Simard; Isabelle Chabot; Marc-Christian Domingo; Sylvie Trottier; Maurice Boissinot; Ann Huletsky; Paul H Roy; Marc Ouellette; Michel G Bergeron; Jacques Corbeil
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Cis-, Trans-, and Total Cefprozil in Healthy Male Koreans.

Authors:  Ji-Hun Jang; Seung-Hyun Jeong; Hea-Young Cho; Yong-Bok Lee
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 6.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.