Literature DB >> 7889702

Fine needle aspiration in infected hip replacements.

T Taylor1, I Beggs.   

Abstract

Ninety painful prosthetic hips from 88 consecutive patients underwent fine needle aspiration and the results compared with clinical progress, operative findings and culture. Fourteen of the 15 cases proven to be infected at operation were correctly identified by fine-needle aspiration. The one hip with a false negative aspirate had an arthrogram which showed a cavity suggesting infection. There were three false positive aspirates. One grew a different organism at surgery from the original aspirate. The other two had no growth on surgical culture. Both had had pre-operative antibiotics. Eleven cultures of doubtful significance were repeated or regarded as negative and the patients carefully followed-up. One repeat culture confirmed infection emphasizing the importance of repeating doubtful aspirates. The sensitivity of aspiration is 93%, specificity is 96%. The accuracy is 95% confirming that aspiration is a simple and reliable method of diagnosing infection in hip prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7889702     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)83044-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Periprosthetic knee infection. One-stage exchange].

Authors:  C Friesecke; J Wodtke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Preoperative aspiration culture for preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xinhua Qu; Zanjing Zhai; Chuanlong Wu; Fangchun Jin; Haowei Li; Lei Wang; Guangwang Liu; Xuqiang Liu; Wengang Wang; Huiwu Li; Xiaoyu Zhang; Zhenan Zhu; Kerong Dai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Aspirations Performed on Hips With Antibiotic Cement Spacers?

Authors:  Jared M Newman; Jaiben George; Alison K Klika; Stephen F Hatem; Wael K Barsoum; W Trevor North; Carlos A Higuera
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Fluoroscopy- vs ultrasound-guided aspiration techniques in the management of periprosthetic joint infection: which is the best?

Authors:  Filippo Randelli; Marco Brioschi; Pietro Randelli; Federico Ambrogi; Silvana Sdao; Alberto Aliprandi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Is there a role for tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection?

Authors:  Geert Meermans; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Management of periprosthetic infection].

Authors:  C Friesecke; J Wodtke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Evaluating the Diagnostic Yield of Computed Tomography-Guided Aspirations in Suspected Post-operative Spine Infections.

Authors:  Jonathan E Jo; Andy O Miller; Matthew R Cohn; Venu M Nemani; Robert Schneider; Darren R Lebl
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-02-22

8.  Two-stage revision of implant-associated infections after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Ellenrieder; Robert Lenz; Maximilian Haenle; Rainer Bader; Wolfram Mittelmeier
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2011-12-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.