Literature DB >> 7888500

Paternal influence on S-phase in the first cell cycle of the bovine embryo.

L N Eid1, S P Lorton, J J Parrish.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether the initiation and length of the zygotic S-phase differs for embryos sired by bulls demonstrating high versus low fertility in vivo. Bovine oocytes were matured in vitro for 24-27 h and fertilized with frozen-thawed bovine semen. Six bulls that differed in fertility level were used in the study. The bulls were classified into two groups: those demonstrating high fertility in vivo (in vivo high-fertility bulls; n = 3), with a group mean +/- SEM lifetime nonreturn rate of 78 +/- 2%, and those demonstrating low fertility in vivo (low-fertility bulls; n = 3), with a group mean +/- SEM nonreturn rate of 69 +/- 1%. The S-phase in zygotes was identified by means of an immunocytochemical technique after pronuclear-stage zygotes were labeled with 5'bromo-2'deoxyuridine (BrdU). To visualize all pronuclei, presumptive zygotes were also stained with propidium iodide. In the first experiment, zygotes were labeled with BrdU at 2-h intervals from 8 to 20 h after sperm addition. There were no differences between bull fertility groups in the time course of pronuclear formation (p > 0.05). The beginning of S-phase was earlier in zygotes sired by high- compared to low-fertility bulls (p < 0.05). The end of S-phase was not affected by sire fertility group (p > 0.05). In the second experiment, zygotes were labeled with BrdU continuously from 8 to 20 h after sperm addition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7888500     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod51.6.1232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  11 in total

1.  Trends, fads and ART!

Authors:  Brian Dale; Yves Menezo; Gianfranco Coppola
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Sequential (hFSH + recFSH) vs homogenous (hFSH or recFSH alone) stimulation: clinical and biochemical (cumulus cell gene expression) aspects.

Authors:  Timur Gurgan; Debbie Montjean; Aygul Demirol; Yves J R Menezo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  In Vivo and In Vitro Evaluation of Bull Semen Processed with Zinc (Zn) Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Rana Jahanbin; Parisa Yazdanshenas; Maryam Rahimi; Atieh Hajarizadeh; Eva Tvrda; Sara Ataei Nazari; Abdollah Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh; Nasser Ghanem
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Bovine in vitro fertilization: in vitro oocyte maturation and sperm capacitation with heparin.

Authors:  John J Parrish
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index.

Authors:  Jamal Hamidi; Christophe Frainais; Edouard Amar; Eric Bailly; Patrice Clément; Yves Ménézo
Journal:  Zygote       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 1.442

6.  Oviductal epithelial cells selected boar sperm according to their functional characteristics.

Authors:  Rebeca López-Úbeda; Francisco A García-Vázquez; Joaquín Gadea; Carmen Matás
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Semen molecular and cellular features: these parameters can reliably predict subsequent ART outcome in a goat model.

Authors:  Fiammetta Berlinguer; Manuela Madeddu; Valeria Pasciu; Sara Succu; Antonio Spezzigu; Valentina Satta; Paolo Mereu; Giovanni G Leoni; Salvatore Naitana
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Directions and applications of CRISPR technology in livestock research.

Authors:  IsmaeI Lamas-Toranzo; Priscila Ramos-Ibeas; Eva Pericuesta; Pablo Bermejo-Álvarez
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.807

9.  Comprehensive proteomic analysis of bovine spermatozoa of varying fertility rates and identification of biomarkers associated with fertility.

Authors:  Divyaswetha Peddinti; Bindu Nanduri; Abdullah Kaya; Jean M Feugang; Shane C Burgess; Erdogan Memili
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2008-02-22

10.  Strategies to reduce genetic mosaicism following CRISPR-mediated genome edition in bovine embryos.

Authors:  I Lamas-Toranzo; B Galiano-Cogolludo; F Cornudella-Ardiaca; J Cobos-Figueroa; O Ousinde; P Bermejo-Álvarez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.