Literature DB >> 7888292

Analgesics and ENT surgery. A clinical comparison of the intraoperative, recovery and postoperative effects of buprenorphine, diclofenac, fentanyl, morphine, nalbuphine, pethidine and placebo given intravenously with induction of anaesthesia.

A A van den Berg1, N M Honjol, N V Prabhu, S Datta, C J Rozario, R Muraleedaran, D Savva.   

Abstract

1. Vomiting and restlessness following ENT and eye surgery are undesirable, and may be related to the emetic and analgesic effects of any analgesic given to augment anaesthesia during surgery. 2. To rationalise the choice of analgesic for routine ENT surgery we examined the intraoperative, recovery and postoperative effects following the administration of either buprenorphine (3.0 to 4.5 micrograms kg-1), diclofenac (1 mg kg-1), fentanyl (1.5 to 2.0 micrograms kg-1), morphine (0.1 to 0.15 mg kg-1), nalbuphine (0.1 to 0.15 mg kg-1), pethidine (1.0 to 1.5 mg kg-1) or saline (as control) given with the induction of anaesthesia in 374 patients. A standardised anaesthetic technique with controlled ventilation using 0.6-0.8% isoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen was employed. The study population constituted 7 similar groups of patients. 3. Intraoperatively, their effects on heart rate and blood pressure, airway pressure and intraocular pressure, were similar. This implies, most surprisingly, that neither their analgesic nor their histamine releasing effects were clinically evident during surgery. By prolonging the time to extubation at the end of anaesthesia, only buprenorphine, fentanyl, morphine and pethidine provided evidence of intraoperative respiratory depression. 4. Postoperatively, buprenorphine was associated with severe respiratory depression, prolonged somnolence, profound analgesia and the highest emesis rate. Diclofenac exhibited no sedative, analgesic, analgesic sparing, emetic or antipyretic effects. Fentanyl provided no sedative or analgesic effects, but was mildly emetic. Morphine provided poor sedation and analgesia, delayed the requirement for re-medication and was highly emetic. Nalbuphine and pethidine produced sedation with analgesia during recovery, a prolonged time to re-medication and a mild emetic effect. None provided evidence, from analysis of postoperative re-medication times and analgesic consumption, of any pre-emptive analgesic effect. 5. We conclude that nalbuphine (mean dose 0.13 mg kg-1) and pethidine (mean dose 1.35 mg kg-1), given individually as a single i.v. bolus during induction of anaesthesia, are the most efficacious analgesics for routine in-patient ENT surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7888292      PMCID: PMC1364917          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04395.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  48 in total

1.  Vagal reflexes and anaesthesia.

Authors:  P R Wood; M A Foley; P G Lawler
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1990-08

2.  Postoperative pain relief--time to take our heads out of the sand?

Authors:  M Harmer
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  No cutaneous histamine release with buprenorphine?

Authors:  S Girotra; R Atray; M Mittal
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Prolonged nausea and vomiting associated with buprenorphine.

Authors:  T Fullerton; E G Timm; G B Kolski; J S Bertino
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  The effect of diclofenac and nefopam on postoperative dental pain.

Authors:  C R Goucke; J P Keaveny; B Kay; T E Healy; M Ryan
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  The morphine sparing effects of diclofenac sodium following abdominal surgery.

Authors:  N B Hodsman; J Burns; A Blyth; G N Kenny; C S McArdle; H Rotman
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Intravenous diclofenac sodium. Does its administration before operation suppress postoperative pain?

Authors:  W I Campbell; R Kendrick; C Patterson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  A comparison of rectal diclofenac with intramuscular papaveretum or placebo for pain relief following tonsillectomy.

Authors:  M E Bone; D Fell
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Postoperative pain control. A survey of current practice.

Authors:  P Semple; I J Jackson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Day case laparoscopy: a survey of postoperative pain and an assessment of the value of diclofenac.

Authors:  N D Edwards; K Barclay; S J Catling; D G Martin; R H Morgan
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Buprenorphine in children. A clinical and pharmacological review].

Authors:  E Michel; B Zernikow
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  [Nalbuphine in pediatric anesthesia].

Authors:  A-M Schultz-Machata; K Becke; M Weiss
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Long-term pediatric opioid based pain control. Case reports].

Authors:  B Zernikow; C Schiessl; C Wamsler; N Griessinger; R Sittl
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  A comparison of ondansetron and prochlorperazine for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after tympanoplasty.

Authors:  A A van den Berg
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  A comparison of analgesic efficacy of tramadol and pethidine for management of postoperative pain in children: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Serdar Ekemen; Birgul Yelken; Huseyin Ilhan; Baran Tokar
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Comparison of Intravenous Morphine with Sublingual Buprenorphine in Management of Postoperative Pain after Closed Reduction Orthopedic Surgery.

Authors:  Ghasem Soltani; Mahmood Khorsand; Alireza Sepehri Shamloo; Lida Jarahi; Nahid Zirak
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-10

7.  A comparision of nalbuphine with morphine for analgesic effects and safety : meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zheng Zeng; Jianhua Lu; Chang Shu; Yuanli Chen; Tong Guo; Qing-ping Wu; Shang-long Yao; Ping Yin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Preemptive Intravenous Nalbuphine for the Treatment of Post-Operative Visceral Pain: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Xiaofen Liu; Jun Hu; Xianwen Hu; Rui Li; Yun Li; Gordon Wong; Ye Zhang
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-06-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.