Literature DB >> 7886721

Distinguishing carotid artery pseudo-occlusion with color-flow Doppler.

S S Berman1, J J Devine, L S Erdoes, G C Hunter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the impact of color-flow Doppler on the accuracy of noninvasive carotid imaging for distinguishing an internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion (string sign) from a complete occlusion.
METHODS: From January 1985 to January 1994, review of noninvasive vascular studies, arteriograms, and operative reports of 26 consecutive patients undergoing 27 carotid endarterectomies for carotid pseudo-occlusion was performed. Further review was conducted of all patients identified with carotid occlusion by noninvasive testing who underwent confirmatory arteriography during the same interval.
RESULTS: Conventional gray-scale duplex scanning (January 1985 to December 1989) correctly identified 3 of 11 (27%) pseudo-occluded internal carotid arteries compared with 15 of 16 (94%) internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusions correctly identified by color-flow Doppler (January 1990 to June 1994) (P < .01). Similarly, carotid occlusion was more accurately identified by color-flow Doppler (33 of 33, 100%) compared with gray-scale duplex scanning (19 of 27, 90%) (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of color-flow Doppler to the duplex evaluation of the extracranial carotid circulation improves the accuracy of distinguishing carotid pseudo-occlusion from the occluded internal carotid artery and may obviate the need for arteriography to identify patients with this critical level of carotid stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7886721     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.26.3.434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Angiology update].

Authors:  C Ranke; H J Trappe
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-05-15

Review 2.  Carotid Near-Occlusion: A Comprehensive Review, Part 1--Definition, Terminology, and Diagnosis.

Authors:  E Johansson; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Carotid Near-Occlusion: A Comprehensive Review, Part 2--Prognosis and Treatment, Pathophysiology, Confusions, and Areas for Improvement.

Authors:  E Johansson; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion.

Authors:  Allan J Fox; Michael Eliasziw; Peter M Rothwell; Matthias H Schmidt; Charles P Warlow; Henry J M Barnett
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Computed tomography angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in vascular mapping for planning of microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible.

Authors:  Michael Lell; Bernd F Tomandl; Katharina Anders; Ulrich Baum; Emeka Nkenke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Outcome evaluation of carotid stenting in high-risk patients with symptomatic carotid near occlusion.

Authors:  B S Choi; J W Park; J E Shin; P-H Lü; J K Kim; S J Kim; D H Lee; J S Kim; H J Kim; D C Suh
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 7.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11

8.  Natural history and clinical outcome of patients with documented carotid artery occlusion.

Authors:  S Cheema; M Clarke-Moloney; E G Kavanagh; P E Burke; P A Grace
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 1.568

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.