Literature DB >> 7886126

[Comparison of the bioavailabilities of erythromycin estolate and erythromycin ethylsuccinate dry suspension preparations in steady state].

H Potthast1, B Schug, M Elze, R Schwerdtle, H Blume.   

Abstract

Relative bioavailability of erythromycin was determined after multiple-dose administration of erythromycin estolate in comparison to erythromycin ethylsuccinate both given as oral suspensions to twelve healthy volunteers. The daily erythromycin dose of erythromycin ethylsuccinate was 50% higher than the respective dose of erythromycin estolate; the dosage interval tau was 12 h for erythromycin estolate and 8 h for erythromycin ethylsuccinate. This scheme was planned in accordance to advices of the respective manufactures. Results of the study confirm the differences in extent of bioavailability of both erythromycin derivatives known from single-dose investigations. Furthermore, the experimental data show that a twice daily administration of 1000 mg erythromycin as erythromycin estolat resulted in sufficiently high plasma concentration of the active compound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7886126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmazie        ISSN: 0031-7144            Impact factor:   1.267


  3 in total

1.  Five days of erythromycin estolate versus ten days of penicillin V in the treatment of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children. Pharyngitis Study Group.

Authors:  D Adam; H Scholz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison of erythromycin estolate versus amoxicillin for the treatment of acute otitis media in children. AOM Study Group.

Authors:  H Scholz; R Noack
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Erythromycin versus neomycin in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis: a randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  Fernando Gomes Romeiro; Fabio da Silva Yamashiro; Madileine Francely Américo; Luciana Aparecida Corá; Giovanni Faria Silva; José Ricardo de Arruda Miranda; Carlos Antonio Caramori
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.