Literature DB >> 7885263

Lexical factors in the word-superiority effect.

N Hildebrandt1, D Caplan, S Sokol, L Torreano.   

Abstract

In the Reicher-Wheeler paradigm, fluent readers can identify letters better when they appear in a word than when they appear in either a pronounceable pseudoword (a lexicality effect) or a single letter (a word-letter effect). It was predicted that if both of these effects involve a lexical factor, then adult acquired dyslexic subjects whose deficit prevents access to visual word form should show disruptions of the normal effects on the Reicher-Wheeler task. The results were that dyslexic subjects as well as matched control subjects showed a lexicality effect; however, while the control subjects showed a normal word-letter effect, the dyslexic subjects showed a reverse letter-superiority effect. Both effects, however, showed a systematic variation: As performance on lexical decision improved, the subjects' performance on words in the Reicher-Wheeler task was better than that for all the other conditions. These subject correlations were replicated by using data from a second lexical decision experiment, which utilized the same words and pseudowords that were used in the Reicher-Wheeler task. In addition, an item analysis showed that the words that the subjects had discriminated correctly in lexical decision showed a significant advantage over those that they had not, as well as an improvement relative to the other conditions. These results suggest that there is a lexical factor underlying the lexicality and word-letter effects, and it is proposed that the abnormal letter-superiority effect can be accounted for as the manifestation of other competing factors.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7885263     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns.

Authors:  K T Spoehr; E E Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

3.  On the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  F M Marchetti; D J Mewhort
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1986

4.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material.

Authors:  G M Reicher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-08

5.  The word without the tachistoscope.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; B Silvers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

6.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics.

Authors:  M C Linebarger; M F Schwartz; E M Saffran
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-05

7.  Spelling-sound effects in reading: time-course and decision criteria.

Authors:  G S Waters; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-11

8.  Is there a lexicality component in the word superiority effect?

Authors:  L Henderson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-08

9.  The role of lateral masking and orthographic structure in letter and word recognition.

Authors:  D W Massaro; D Klitzke
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1979-09

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Patching; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.