Literature DB >> 7885261

Monitoring of comprehension: the role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text.

C A Weaver1, D S Bryant.   

Abstract

The effect of text difficulty on metamemory for narrative and expository text was investigated. In Experiment 1, we found an interaction between type of text and type of question (thematic or detailed). For readers of narrative texts, correlations between predicted and actual performance were highest for detailed questions, but this pattern was reversed for readers of expository texts. Next, text difficulty was explored as a possible factor affecting metamemory accuracy. In Experiments 2 and 3, metamemory accuracy was a nonmonotonic function of text difficulty. Subjects made remarkably accurate predictions of future performance (mean G > .6) for both narrative and expository texts that were of intermediate difficulty (approximately a 12th-grade reading level). We propose an optimum effort hypothesis, predicting greatest metamemory accuracy when the texts are of intermediate difficulty.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7885261     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  4 in total

1.  Metamemory for narrative text.

Authors:  R H Maki; S Swett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-01

2.  Inexpert calibration of comprehension.

Authors:  A M Glenberg; W Epstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-01

3.  Metacomprehension of text material.

Authors:  R H Maki; S L Berry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.

Authors:  T O Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  The postdiction superiority effect in metacomprehension of text.

Authors:  B H Pierce; S M Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability.

Authors:  W L Kelemen; P J Frost; C A Weaver
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

3.  The rereading effect: metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials.

Authors:  K A Rawson; J Dunlosky; K W Thiede
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

Review 4.  Aging and self-regulated language processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Interruption-similarity effects during discourse processing.

Authors:  Kerry Ledoux; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-10

6.  Metacomprehension for educationally relevant materials: dramatic effects of encoding-retrieval interactions.

Authors:  Ayanna K Thomas; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

7.  The negative cascade of incongruent generative study-test processing in memory and metacomprehension.

Authors:  Ayanna Kim Thomas; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

8.  Predicting performance on text: delayed versus immediate predictions and tests.

Authors:  R H Maki
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

9.  Levels of Reading Comprehension Across Text Types: A Comparison of Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Expository and Narrative Texts in Iranian EFL Learners.

Authors:  Mahmood Saadatnia; Saeed Ketabi; Mansoor Tavakoli
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10

Review 10.  Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raymond A Mar; Jingyuan Li; Anh T P Nguyen; Cindy P Ta
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.