PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of patients with relapsed or resistant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) and to determine the main prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seven patients with relapsed or resistant intermediate-/high-grade NHL underwent high-dose carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) chemotherapy and ABMT at University College Hospitals between September 1981 and February 1993. The minimum follow-up duration of all patients is 6 months. RESULTS: At 3 months, the overall response rate to BEAM and ABMT was 73% (41% complete response and 32% partial response). The 5-year actuarial overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 41% and 35%, respectively. The early procedure-related mortality rate was 7% (eight of 107 patients). On multivariate analysis, the main prognostic factor was disease status at the time of ABMT. Patients with chemosensitive disease had an actuarial 5-year survival rate of 49% at 5 years compared with 13% for those with chemoresistant disease (P < .001). For patients considered to have chemosensitive disease at the time of transplantation, there is a significant difference in the actuarial progression-free survival rates for those who received high-dose therapy after attaining a partial response to first-line therapy (69% at 5 years) as compared with those with sensitive but relapsed disease (32% at 5 years) (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Patients with chemosensitive disease benefit most from high-dose chemotherapy, and those who receive such therapy early after achieving a partial response to first-line therapy have a high rate of cure.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of patients with relapsed or resistant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) and to determine the main prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seven patients with relapsed or resistant intermediate-/high-grade NHL underwent high-dose carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) chemotherapy and ABMT at University College Hospitals between September 1981 and February 1993. The minimum follow-up duration of all patients is 6 months. RESULTS: At 3 months, the overall response rate to BEAM and ABMT was 73% (41% complete response and 32% partial response). The 5-year actuarial overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 41% and 35%, respectively. The early procedure-related mortality rate was 7% (eight of 107 patients). On multivariate analysis, the main prognostic factor was disease status at the time of ABMT. Patients with chemosensitive disease had an actuarial 5-year survival rate of 49% at 5 years compared with 13% for those with chemoresistant disease (P < .001). For patients considered to have chemosensitive disease at the time of transplantation, there is a significant difference in the actuarial progression-free survival rates for those who received high-dose therapy after attaining a partial response to first-line therapy (69% at 5 years) as compared with those with sensitive but relapsed disease (32% at 5 years) (P = .003). CONCLUSION:Patients with chemosensitive disease benefit most from high-dose chemotherapy, and those who receive such therapy early after achieving a partial response to first-line therapy have a high rate of cure.
Authors: S Garciaz; D Coso; J-M Schiano de Collela; F Broussais; A-M Stoppa; T Aurran; C Chabannon; A Helvig; L Xerri; D Blaise; R Bouabdallah Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Amrita Y Krishnan; Joycelynne Palmer; Auayporn P Nademanee; Robert Chen; Leslie L Popplewell; Ni-Chun Tsai; James F Sanchez; Jennifer Simpson; Ricardo Spielberger; Dave Yamauchi; Stephen J Forman Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2017-03-04 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Partow Kebriaei; Timothy Madden; Reza Kazerooni; Xuemei Wang; Peter F Thall; Celina Ledesma; Yago Nieto; Elizabeth J Shpall; Chitra Hosing; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Uday Popat; Issa Khouri; Richard E Champlin; Roy B Jones; Borje S Andersson Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Frank Kroschinsky; Denise Röllig; Barbara Riemer; Michael Kramer; Rainer Ordemann; Johannes Schetelig; Martin Bornhäuser; Gerhard Ehninger; Mathias Hänel Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2019-09-28 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Santosha A Vardhana; Craig S Sauter; Matthew J Matasar; Andrew D Zelenetz; Natasha Galasso; Kaitlin M Woo; Zhigang Zhang; Craig H Moskowitz Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Stacey M Parker; Horatiu Olteanu; Peter VanTuinen; Colleen A Lawton; Christopher J Schultz; Kathleen K Christians; Timothy S Fenske Journal: Int J Hematol Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 2.490
Authors: Ulrich J M Mey; Vandana Jha; John W Strehl; Marcus Gorschlueter; Christian Rabe; Eckfried Hoebert; Henning Popp; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf Journal: Ger Med Sci Date: 2007-06-19