Literature DB >> 7881655

Selection of spirometric measurements in a clinical trial, the Lung Health Study.

R A Wise1, J Connett, K Kurnow, J Grill, L Johnson, R Kanner, P Enright.   

Abstract

Although current recommendations for spirometry require that the largest value of FEV1 and FVC should be taken from the largest values of different maneuvers, the validity of this approach was recently questioned. It has been suggested that selection of the maneuver with the largest peak flow or the maneuver with the largest FVC should be used for measurement of spirometric indices. The present analysis was therefore undertaken to determine which method of selection of spirometric maneuvers would give the least short-term variability in a clinical trial population. We examined the spirometry test sessions from 5,885 individuals with mild to moderate chronic airflow obstruction who were screened at two visits 24.9 +/- 17.1 d apart for entry into a multi-center clinical trial, the Lung Health Study. We compared eight potential selection methods for FEV1 and FVC. Using these different selection methods, the coefficient of variation ranged from 4.1 to 4.9% for FEV1 and from 3.5 to 5.7% for FVC. The average absolute difference between the two test sessions ranged from 110 to 123 ml for FEV1 and from 149 to 200 ml for FVC. Although all of the methods gave good results, the mean of the three highest values and the largest single value from all maneuvers provided the least short-term variability for both FEV1 and FVC. We therefore conclude that there is no reason to change the currently recommended selection methods for FEV1 and FVC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7881655     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.3.7881655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  4 in total

1.  Lung function in healthy never smoking adults: reference values and lower limits of normal of a Swiss population.

Authors:  O Brändli; C Schindler; N Künzli; R Keller; A P Perruchoud
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Impact of endoscopic lung volume reduction on right ventricular myocardial function.

Authors:  Carmen Pizarro; Robert Schueler; Christoph Hammerstingl; Izabela Tuleta; Georg Nickenig; Dirk Skowasch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Alpha 1 antitrypsin to treat lung disease in alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency: recent developments and clinical implications.

Authors:  Kenneth R Chapman; Joanna Chorostowska-Wynimko; A Rembert Koczulla; Ilaria Ferrarotti; Noel G McElvaney
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-01-31

4.  A comparison of alternative selection methods for reporting spirometric parameters in healthy adults.

Authors:  Jennifer H Therkorn; Daniella R Toto; Michael J Falvo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.