Literature DB >> 7880703

Comparison of extradural fentanyl, bupivacaine and two fentanyl-bupivacaine mixtures of pain relief after abdominal surgery.

T A Torda1, P Hann, G Mills, G De Leon, D Penman.   

Abstract

Fentanyl 50 micrograms, bupivacaine 50 mg and two mixtures containing fentanyl 50 micrograms and bupivacaine 25 mg or 12.5 mg (0.25 and 0.125%), respectively, in a volume of 10 ml were administered via thoracic extradural catheters to 24 patients after major abdominal surgery. All patients received all four treatments, in a randomized order, so that each patient received one of the 24 possible combinations of the four treatments. Pain relief was assessed by a linear analogue pain scale and the Prince Henry Hospital pain score. The duration of pain relief, effects on ventilatory frequency, heart rate, arterial pressure and central venous pressure were also recorded. Mean reductions in the analogue pain scale for fentanyl, bupivacaine, and fentanyl in 0.25% and 0.125% bupivacaine were 80 (SEM 5) %, 87 (4) %, 86 (5) % and 77 (5) %, respectively (ns). Pain scores decreased by 62 (6) %, 83 (5) %, 77 (6) % and 72 (6) %, respectively (ns). Mean arterial pressure decreased to 90 (2) %, 70 (2) %, 81 (2) % and 82 (3) %, respectively, of pretreatment values. In this respect, bupivacaine alone was significantly different from the three other treatments (P < 0.001). Hypotension (reduction in arterial pressure greater than 25% of pretreatment mean arterial pressure) was also more frequent after bupivacaine alone (P < 0.01). Effects on ventilation, heart rate and central venous pressure did not differ between the four treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7880703     DOI: 10.1093/bja/74.1.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  6 in total

1.  [The clinical use of spinal opioids, part 1].

Authors:  N Rawal
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-08-26       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Laparoscopic versus traditional open splenectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with hypersplenism.

Authors:  Han-Hua Dong; Bin Mei; Fei-Long Liu; Zhi-Wei Zhang; Bi-Xiang Zhang; Zhi-Yong Huang; Xiao-Ping Chen; Wan-Guang Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-28

3.  Epidural and opioid analgesia following the Nuss procedure.

Authors:  Malgorzata Walaszczyk; Piotr Knapik; Hanna Misiolek; Wojciech Korlacki
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-11

Review 4.  Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Mina Nishimori; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-16

Review 5.  Assessment and pathophysiology of pain in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Marek Zubrzycki; Andreas Liebold; Christian Skrabal; Helmut Reinelt; Mechthild Ziegler; Ewelina Perdas; Maria Zubrzycka
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Assessment of quality of life in patients with non-operated pancreatic cancer after videothoracoscopic splanchnicectomy.

Authors:  Jacek Smigielski; Lukasz Piskorz; Marcin Wawrzycki; Leszek Kutwin; Piotr Misiak; Marian Brocki
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 1.195

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.