Literature DB >> 7880575

Understanding differences between high and low childhood accident rate areas: the importance of qualitative data.

G Sparks1, M A Craven, C Worth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The research discussed in the paper was undertaken for a District Health Authority to aid the development of appropriate policies to achieve the Health of the nation strategic target for reducing the death rate from accidents amongst children under 15. There has been a great deal of quantitative and epidemiological research into childhood accidents which has demonstrated a clear social class gradient in childhood accidents, fatalities and injuries. Less research has been undertaken into the possible reasons for the 'social patterning' of accidents and other aspects of health. Recent sociological research on childhood accidents has adopted a more qualitative approach and studied childhood safety within a family and community context. This approach has been used in the Huddersfield study on parental perspectives on childhood safety.
METHODS: In-depth interviews were held with a sample of parents from a high and a low childhood accident rate area.
RESULTS: The two focus areas reveal contrasting social profiles. There were significant differences on a number of aspects of parental perceptions on safety and beliefs about accidents, in the two areas. Analysis of accident events revealed that all the families in the high childhood accident rate area sample had children who had had an accident in the past which required hospital treatment. A high proportion of their children had experienced 'near misses'. In contrast, half the families in the low childhood accident rate area had children who had experienced an accident in the past and a much smaller proportion had experienced 'near misses'. All the parents in the sample from both areas developed rules, routines and practices to keep their children safe. The study suggests that there are social class differences in the effective use of these safety rules.
CONCLUSION: Qualitatively orientated sociological research into parental perspectives on childhood safety contributes to an understanding of the reasons for the social patterning of childhood accidents. Such information should be of help to professionals in their prevention and safety promotion work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7880575     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  6 in total

1.  Cumulative mortality in children aged 1 to 6 years born in Western Australia from 1980-89.

Authors:  L M Alessandri; H M Chambers; C Garfield; S Vukovich; A W Read
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Socioeconomic status and the prevention of child home injuries: a survey of parents of preschool children.

Authors:  S A Evans; H S Kohli
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  Area socioeconomic status and childhood injury morbidity in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Roslyn Poulos; Andrew Hayen; Caroline Finch; Anthony Zwi
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  Parental perceptions of barriers and facilitators to preventing child unintentional injuries within the home: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Joanne Ablewhite; Isabel Peel; Lisa McDaid; Adrian Hawkins; Trudy Goodenough; Toity Deave; Jane Stewart; Denise Kendrick
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Low-Income Mothers' Descriptions of Children's Injury-Related Events: A Discourse Analysis.

Authors:  Lise L Olsen; Joan L Bottorff; Parminder Raina; Jim Frankish
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2015-01-21

6.  Approaches used by parents to keep their children safe at home: a qualitative study to explore the perspectives of parents with children aged under five years.

Authors:  Joanne Ablewhite; Lisa McDaid; Adrian Hawkins; Isabel Peel; Trudy Goodenough; Toity Deave; Jane Stewart; Michael Watson; Denise Kendrick
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.