Literature DB >> 7880480

Bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements after enamel etching.

O Cortes1, F Garcia-Godoy, J R Boj.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the shear bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomers to enamel etched or unetched. Human, non-carious extracted permanent molars stored in distilled water were used. Flat buccal and lingual enamel surfaces were ground wet on 600-grit silicon carbide paper. The teeth were then distributed at random into six groups of 5 teeth (10 surfaces) each: Group 1: Fuji II LC, no enamel etching; Group 2: Fuji II LC, enamel etched with 10% phosphoric acid for 10 seconds; Group 3: Dyract, no enamel etching; Group 4: Dyract, enamel etched with 10% phosphoric acid for 10 seconds; Group 5: Photac-Fil, no enamel etching; Group 6: Photac-Fil, enamel etched with 10% phosphoric acid for 10 seconds. Cylindrical samples of the glass ionomers were prepared in plastic molds and bonded to the enamel surface according to the manufacturers' instructions. All samples were placed in distilled water for 24 hours, and sheared with an Instron at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. The results (in MPa) were: Group 1: 11.29 +/- 4.84; Group 2: 19.64 +/- 5.43; Group 3: 8.26 +/- 3.61; Group 4: 22.04 +/- 5.40; Group 5: 2.05 +/- 3.05; Group 6: 9.12 +/- 6.61. ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls procedure revealed that on etched enamel, Fuji II LC and Dyract had a significantly higher bond strength than all the other groups tested (P < 0.0001), but not significantly different between each other. With these two groups, cohesive failure within the material was recorded in all samples while in the unetched samples, all specimens displayed an adhesive failure (glass ionomer-enamel interface). All samples with Photac-Fil, with or without enamel etching had adhesive failures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7880480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  4 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial and Adhesive Properties of Chitosan Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement: an In vitro Study.

Authors:  Arpan Debnath; Srivastava Bagepalli Kesavappa; Gyanendra Pratap Singh; Shruthi Eshwar; Vipin Jain; Madhuniranjan Swamy; Punith Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

2.  Improvement of enamel bond strengths for conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers: acid-etching vs. conditioning.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Tian Tang; Zhen-liang Zhang; Bing Liang; Xiao-miao Wang; Bai-ping Fu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class V carious lesions: 5-year results.

Authors:  Mustafa Demirci; Hande Sar Sancakli; Omer Uysal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth.

Authors:  Romina Mazaheri; Leila Pishevar; Ava Vali Shichani; Sanas Geravandi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.