Literature DB >> 7880478

Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems.

A M Diaz-Arnold1, D W Wistrom, S A Aquilino, E J Swift.   

Abstract

This study compared the shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to porcelain with six commercial porcelain repair adhesive systems. The porcelain repair systems tested were: All-Bond 2, Clearfil Porcelain Bond, Ceram-Etch, C&B Metabond with Etch-Free Primer, Scotchprime, and Ultradent Porcelain Etch. Resin composite cylinders were bonded to primed porcelain surfaces and the specimens were thermocycled and stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 36 days. After storage, a testing machine was used to deliver a shear force parallel to the porcelain/composite interface. Mean load to failure was calculated for each group and the fracture location was noted. Results demonstrated cohesive porcelain failures and high bond strengths for All-Bond 2, Clearfil, Metabond, Scotchprime, and Ultradent. Statistical analysis revealed significantly lower bond strengths for the group that failed at the porcelain/composite interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7880478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  2 in total

1.  Shear Bond Strengths of Methacrylate- and Silorane-based Composite Resins to Feldspathic Porcelain using Different Adhesive Systems.

Authors:  Narmin Mohammadi; Maryam Shakur Shahabi; Soodabeh Kimyai; Fatemeh Pournagi Azar; Mohammad Esmaeel Ebrahimi Chaharom
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-09-16

2.  Comparing two intraoral porcelain repair systems for shear bond strength in repaired cohesive and adhesive fractures, for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Jaiveer Singh Yadav; Nupur Dabas; Akshay Bhargava; Puja Malhotra; Bhupender Yadav; Manoti Sehgal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019-10-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.