Literature DB >> 7878535

Laparoscopic drainage of lymphoceles after kidney transplantation: indications and limitations.

R W Gruessner1, C Fasola, E Benedetti, M C Foshager, A C Gruessner, A J Matas, J S Najarian, R L Goodale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic lymphoceles are not uncommon after kidney transplantations. Surgical marsupialization with internal drainage is the treatment of choice. However, laparoscopic drainage is reportedly as effective, with only minimal trauma.
METHODS: We attempted 14 laparoscopic lymphocele drainages during a 3-year period and studied the indications and limitations, using intraoperative ultrasonography in all cases.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic drainage was successful in only 9 (64%) of 14 patients. A conversion to open laparotomy was necessary in five patients; their lymphoceles were lateral and either posterior or inferior to the kidney. Two patients with initially successful laparoscopic drainage required conversion to open laparotomy 21 and 83 days later; their lymphoceles were inferior to the kidney. Laparoscopic drainage shortened the median hospital stay by 4 days versus open surgical drainage and by 7 days versus conversion. Hospital costs for laparoscopic drainage averaged $7400 less versus open drainage and $10,300 less versus conversion.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with symptomatic lymphoceles medial and either superior or anterior to the kidney, laparoscopic drainage under intraoperative ultrasonographic guidance is easy, safe, and effective. It decreases hospitalization, convalescence, and costs. In patients with symptomatic lymphoceles lateral and either posterior or inferior to the kidney, laparoscopic drainage may fail because of anatomic inaccessibility and technical impracticability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7878535     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(05)80204-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic fenestration of posttransplant lymphoceles.

Authors:  C Doehn; P Fornara; L Fricke; D Jocham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Kidney-pancreas transplantation: assessment of key imaging findings in the acute setting.

Authors:  Matthew T Heller; Alexander Hattoum
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-05-29

3.  Giant pseudocyst of the anterior abdominal wall following mesh repair of incisional hernia: a rare complication managed laparoscopically.

Authors:  Prateek K Mehrotra; C S Ramachandran; Deep Goel; Vijay Arora
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Surgical complications requiring early relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation: a multivariate risk factor and economic impact analysis of the cyclosporine era.

Authors:  C Troppmann; A C Gruessner; D L Dunn; D E Sutherland; R W Gruessner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Management of pelvic lymphoceles following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Omer A Raheem; Wassim M Bazzi; J Kellogg Parsons; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2012-05

6.  Idiopathic giant abdominal lymph cyst: a case report.

Authors:  Thorsten H Ecke; Holger Gerullis; Christoph J Heuck; Steffen Hallmann; Carsten Lange; Jürgen Ruttloff
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2011-01-19

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of ureteral complications following renal transplantation.

Authors:  Brian D Duty; John M Barry
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-08-24

Review 8.  Lymphatic disorders after renal transplantation: new insights for an old complication.

Authors:  Andrea Ranghino; Giuseppe Paolo Segoloni; Fedele Lasaponara; Luigi Biancone
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2015-07-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.