Literature DB >> 7878300

Standardization of the surgical pathology report: formats, templates, and synoptic reports.

K O Leslie1, J Rosai.   

Abstract

The most important routine vehicle for communication in surgical pathology is the specimen report. Although accuracy, clarity and thoroughness are the main goals, significant variability in format and content exists. In an effort to make reports more consistent, several mechanisms are useful and amenable for use in a computerized environment. These include templates, checklists, and tabular data reporting in the form of so-called synoptic reports. Such mechanisms are designed to ensure that critical information can be obtained consistently and easily from the report regardless of the institution of origin. Standardization is most easily extended to specific types of specimens, such as those resulting from mastectomies or colectomies with malignant neoplasms. The ultimate goal of the mechanisms discussed herein is to attain uniformity and consistency of included data found to be relevant to clinical management of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7878300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 0740-2570            Impact factor:   3.464


  20 in total

1.  Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; David M Panicek; Alexandra R Berk; Yuelin Li; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  An open-standards grammar for outline-style radiology report templates.

Authors:  Selen Bozkurt; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Evidence of effectiveness of clinical audit in improving histopathology reporting standards of mastectomy specimens.

Authors:  M A Appleton; A G Douglas-Jones; J M Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Does everything a surgeon takes out have to be seen by a pathologist? A review of the current pathology practice.

Authors:  Ivan Damjanov; Semir Vranic; Faruk Skenderi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Novel Structured Reporting Systems for Theranostic Radiotracers.

Authors:  Rudolf A Werner; Ralph A Bundschuh; Lena Bundschuh; Stefano Fanti; Mehrbod S Javadi; Takahiro Higuchi; Alexander Weich; Kenneth J Pienta; Andreas K Buck; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Ken Herrmann; Constantin Lapa; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Ocular surface squamous neoplasia: terminology that is conceptually friendly but clinically perilous.

Authors:  C E Margo; A A White
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Identifying free-text features to improve automated classification of structured histopathology reports for feline small intestinal disease.

Authors:  Abdullah Awaysheh; Jeffrey Wilcke; François Elvinger; Loren Rees; Weiguo Fan; Kurt Zimmerman
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 1.279

8.  Recall of structured radiology reports is significantly superior to that of unstructured reports.

Authors:  Bryan W Buckley; Leslie Daly; Grainne N Allen; Carole A Ridge
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Relevance of routine pathology review in cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Heleen J van Beekhuizen; Mieloe D Freulings; Shatavisha Dasgupta; Folkert J van Kemenade; Patricia C Ewing-Graham; Helena C van Doorn
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Critical Diagnoses in Ophthalmic Pathology: Suspected Important Unanticipated Diagnoses in Surgically Removed Eyes.

Authors:  Curtis E Margo
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2019-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.