Literature DB >> 7877322

Comparison of outcomes with three atrial incisions for mitral valve operations. Right lateral, superior septal, and transseptal.

J R Utley1, S A Leyland, T Nguyenduy.   

Abstract

We compared the preoperative status, operative factors, and postoperative outcomes among patients having mitral valve operations with three atrial incisions. The incisions were right lateral (n = 66), superior septal (n = 46), and transseptal (n = 37). Differences in patient and operative factors among the groups were not predictors of adverse postoperative outcomes with multiple regression analysis. Postoperative pulmonary failure was less common in the superior septal group. Patients in the superior septal group more commonly required permanent pacemakers than those in the right lateral group. In patients with sinus rhythm before operation, sinus rhythm had returned before hospital discharge more commonly in those in the right lateral group (35 of 44, 80%) than in those in the superior septal group (18 of 28, 46%) or in the transseptal group (9 of 13, 69%). With multiple regression analysis the type of atrial incision was not a predictor of postoperative pulmonary failure or need for permanent pacemaker. Right lateral and transseptal atrial incisions were predictors of retention of sinus rhythm after operation. We conclude that the results of superior septal incision are comparable with those of other incisions except for a slightly greater risk of loss of sinus rhythm. One must weigh the technical advantages of the superior septal incision against the risk of loss of sinus rhythm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7877322     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70292-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

1.  Assessment Of Sinoatrial Node Function In Patients With Persistent And Long-Standing Persistent Forms Of Atrial Fibrillation After Maze III Procedure Combined With Mitral Valve operation.

Authors:  Aleksei A Kulikov; Leo A Bokeria
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-06-30

2.  Combined superior-transseptal approach versus conventional approach for mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  H Tenpaku; S Wariishi; N Kanemitsu; M Okabe; T Nakamura
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-11

3.  Multidetector CT imaging of arterial supply to sinuatrial and atrioventricular nodes.

Authors:  Tugba Cezlan; Senem Senturk; Musturay Karcaaltıncaba; Aslan Bilici
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Comparison of superior septal approach with left atriotomy in mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Ebuzer Aydin; Akin Arslan; Mehmet Ozkokeli
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Mitral Valve Replacement-Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Johan van der Merwe; Filip Casselman
Journal:  Open J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-07-13

6.  Sinus node dysfunction after surgical atrial fibrillation ablation with concomitant mitral valve surgery: Determinants and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Darae Kim; Chi Young Shim; Geu-Ru Hong; In Jeong Cho; Seung Hyun Lee; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Sak Lee; Jong-Won Ha; Byung-Chul Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.