Literature DB >> 7877300

Prediction of asymptotic threshold shift caused by hearing aid use.

J H Macrae1.   

Abstract

This study used a well-verified mathematical model to predict asymptotic temporary threshold shift (ATS) caused by hearing aid use. The model determined the amounts of ATS to be expected if real ear insertion gains (REIGs) recommended by the current National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) procedure are used. It also determined the consequences of use of excess REIG and of high input levels to hearing aids. If recommended REIGs are used and input levels are normal (average A-weighted input levels of about 61 dB SPL), ATS is unlikely to occur for clients who have typical audiograms with three-frequency average pure-tone thresholds (PTAs) less than 60 dB HL. For people with PTAs greater than 60 dB HL, small amounts of ATS can be expected to occur during hearing aid use, but these amounts of ATS are safe, that is, unlikely to be associated with permanent threshold shift (PTS) for individuals with all PTAs except those greater than about 100 dB HL. If REIGs are 15 dB greater than those recommended, the amounts of ATS will be unsafe for people with PTAs greater than about 80 dB HL. It appears unwise for clients who have this degree of hearing loss to use excess REIG. The use of excess REIG in high ambient levels of sound (average A-weighted input levels of about 75 dB SPL) is likely to cause PTS for hearing aid users with PTAs of about 50 dB HL or greater. Clients who prefer to use excess REIG should therefore avoid high ambient sound levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7877300     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3706.1450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: predicted speech intelligibility and loudness.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Earl E Johnson; Sanna Hou; Harvey Dillon; Vicky Zhang; Lauren Burns; Patricia van Buynder; Angela Wong; Christopher Flynn
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Theoretical and practical considerations in compression hearing AIDS.

Authors:  F K Kuk
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1996-03

3.  Hearing-aid safety: a comparison of estimated threshold shifts for gains recommended by NAL-NL2 and DSL m[i/o] prescriptions for children.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Earl E Johnson; Mark Seeto; John H Macrae
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-18

5.  Stability of Audiometric Thresholds for Children with Hearing Aids Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Implications for Safety.

Authors:  Ryan McCreery; Elizabeth Walker; Meredith Spratford; Benjamin Kirby; Jacob Oleson; Marc Brennan
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 6.  Conventional Amplification for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lindsey E Jorgensen; Emily A Benson; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

7.  Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Dianne J Van Tasell; Bill Rabinowitz; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.