Literature DB >> 7876770

Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers.

F R Vellutino1, D M Scanlon, D Spearing.   

Abstract

Three studies were conducted evaluating semantic and phonological coding deficits as alternative explanations of reading disability. In the first study, poor and normal readers in second and sixth grade were compared on various tests evaluating semantic development as well as on tests evaluating rapid naming and pseudoword decoding as independent measures of phonological coding ability. In a second study, the same subjects were given verbal memory and visual-verbal learning tasks using high and low meaning words as verbal stimuli and Chinese ideographs as visual stimuli. On the semantic tasks, poor readers performed below the level of the normal readers only at the sixth grade level, but, on the rapid naming and pseudoword learning tasks, they performed below the normal readers at the second as well as at the sixth grade level. On both the verbal memory and visual-verbal learning tasks, performance in poor readers approximated that of normal readers when the word stimuli were high in meaning but not when they were low in meaning. These patterns were essentially replicated in a third study that used some of the same semantic and phonological measures used in the first experiment, and verbal memory and visual-verbal learning tasks that employed word lists and visual stimuli (novel alphabetic characters) that more closely approximated those used in learning to read. It was concluded that semantic coding deficits are an unlikely cause of reading difficulties in most poor readers at the beginning stages of reading skills acquisition, but accrue as a consequence of prolonged reading difficulties in older readers. It was also concluded that phonological coding deficits are a probable cause of reading difficulties in most poor readers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7876770     DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1995.1004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  9 in total

1.  Is Semantics Affected by Missing a Critical Period? Evidence from the Persian Deaf.

Authors:  Yassaman Choubsaz; Amer Gheitury
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-02

2.  Elaborative feedback: Engaging reward and task-relevant brain regions promotes learning in pseudoword reading aloud.

Authors:  Samantha R Mattheiss; Edward J Alexander; William W Graves
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Phonological and semantic factors in the object-naming errors of skilled and less-skilled readers.

Authors:  R B Katz
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1996-01

4.  Print-Speech Convergence Predicts Future Reading Outcomes in Early Readers.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Peter J Molfese; Stephen J Frost; W Einar Mencl; Robert K Fulbright; Fumiko Hoeft; Nicole Landi; Donald Shankweiler; Kenneth R Pugh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-11-20

5.  A cross-cultural comparison of verbal learning and memory functions in reading disabled American and Norwegian adolescents.

Authors:  Arve E Asbjørnsen; John E Obrzut; James D Oyler
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2014-03-06

6.  Encoding order and developmental dyslexia: a family of skills predicting different orthographic components.

Authors:  Cristina Romani; Effie Tsouknida; Andrew Olson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Devil in the details? Developmental dyslexia and visual long-term memory for details.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Julia Rohrßen; Muna van Ermingen-Marbach; Julia Pape-Neumann; Stefan Heim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-02

8.  ERPs Reveal the Time-Course of Aberrant Visual-Phonological Binding in Developmental Dyslexia.

Authors:  Manon W Jones; Jan-Rouke Kuipers; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Impaired neural mechanism for online novel word acquisition in dyslexic children.

Authors:  Lilli Kimppa; Yury Shtyrov; Eino Partanen; Teija Kujala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.