Literature DB >> 7876725

The relationship between tumour volume and the extent of spread in colorectal carcinoma.

K W Scott1, R H Grace.   

Abstract

115 colorectal carcinomas were measured in three dimensions. To compare the tumour volume, greatest linear dimension and the maximum thickness of colorectal carcinomas with the extent of spread. A formula was devised for estimating tumour volume based on the oval shape of most carcinomas. Dukes staging was performed after xylene/alcohol fat clearance. The mean tumour volume of Dukes B tumours was greater than A tumours. The mean volume of C tumours was greater than that of A tumours. The mean volume of Dukes B tumours was greater than that of C tumours. The greatest linear dimension and the tumour thickness measurements also showed differences but were not as discriminating as the tumour volume. Using the Astler and Coller modification of Dukes staging, the mean tumour volume of C2 tumours was significantly greater than that of C1 tumours. Both C1 and C2 tumour volumes when considered separately were smaller than those of the B tumours. There was a significant positive correlation coefficient between tumour volume and the greatest linear dimension and also between tumour volume and the tumour thickness. There was no significant correlation within the C tumours between tumour volume and the number of lymph nodes with metastatic deposits. Colorectal carcinomas differ from other solid tumours in their growth pattern and metastatic behaviour. There is no direct relationship between increasing tumour size and progression in the Dukes staging. Some tumours appear to metastasize to lymph nodes while still small (C1 tumours); other tumours appear not to metastasize to lymph nodes regardless of size (B tumours).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7876725     DOI: 10.1007/bf00292251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  17 in total

1.  THE CHANCE OF CANCER AND LYMPHATIC METASTASIS IN SMALL COLON TUMORS DISCOVERED ON X-RAY EXAMINATION.

Authors:  R S GRINNELL
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Relationship of the size of colonic tumors to their cellular composition and biological behavior.

Authors:  J S SPRATT; L V ACKERMAN
Journal:  Surg Forum       Date:  1960

3.  Influence of lesion size and location on prognosis in rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  R S Berardi
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1976-03

4.  Carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  C K McSherry; G N Cornell; F Glenn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Cancer of the breast: size of neoplasm and prognosis.

Authors:  B Fisher; N H Slack; I D Bross
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Histopathology reporting in large bowel cancer.

Authors:  W K Blenkinsopp; S Stewart-Brown; L Blesovsky; G Kearney; L P Fielding
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  A multivariate analysis of pathologic prognostic indicators in large bowel cancer.

Authors:  T Wiggers; J W Arends; B Schutte; L Volovics; F T Bosman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Tumor size and regional lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. A preliminary analysis from the NSABP clinical trials.

Authors:  N Wolmark; I Cruz; C K Redmond; B Fisher; E R Fisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Pathological studies in rectal cancer.

Authors:  A M Cohen; W C Wood; L L Gunderson; M Shinnar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Patterns of recurrence following curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  R M Olson; N P Perencevich; A W Malcolm; J T Chaffey; R E Wilson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  Correlation of rectal tumor volumes with oncological outcomes for low rectal cancers: does tumor size matter?

Authors:  Muhammad Tayyab; Abdul Razack; Abhiram Sharma; James Gunn; John E Hartley
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.549

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.