| Literature DB >> 7876389 |
E A Barclay1, J E Coia, P C Kale, R G Masterton.
Abstract
Two quantitative, automated methods for the determination of C reactive protein (CRP) were compared: turbidimetry (Cobas Fara II, Roche, Welwyn Garden City, UK) and fluorescence polarisation TDx, Abbott, Wokingham, UK). One hundred and twenty routine serum samples submitted for measurement of CRP were tested using both procedures. The results were compared using regression line analysis and showed a high degree of correlation (r2 = 0.99, X coefficient = 1.01, constant = 0.11). C reactive protein can be accurately measured using the automated turbidimetric method which can be recommended as an alternative to fluorescence polarisation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1994 PMID: 7876389 PMCID: PMC502208 DOI: 10.1136/jcp.47.12.1119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Pathol ISSN: 0021-9746 Impact factor: 3.411