Literature DB >> 7871008

Effects of buspirone and ipsapirone on schedule induced polydipsia: comparison with 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) and raclopride.

C N Ryan1, J L Evenden, M Petterson.   

Abstract

In the present experiments, the effects of the azapirone anxiolytics, buspirone and ipsapirone, on excessive drinking induced by a FT-60 schedule of food delivery (schedule induced polydipsia, SIP) were investigated. Because buspirone is known to block dopamine receptors and both buspirone and ipsapirone act as agonists at the 5-HT1A receptor, their effects on polydipsia were compared to raclopride, an antagonist at D2 receptors, and 8-OH-DPAT, an agonist at the 5-HT1A receptor, thus providing information about the relative importance of the serotonergic and/or dopaminergic systems for the maintenance of polydipsia. The effects of all four drugs were investigated both acutely, and following repeated treatment. The doses employed were as follows: buspirone, 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg; raclopride, 0.05, 0.15, and 0.5 mg/kg; 8-OH-DPAT, 0.1, and 1.0 mg/kg and ipsapirone, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0 mg/kg. Administered acutely, the lowest doses of buspirone and raclopride did not alter drinking, whilst the low dose of 8-OH-DPAT significantly reduced polydipsia. These effects were reversed following repeated treatment over 16 successive days. Buspirone 1.0 mg/kg and 0.05 mg/kg raclopride reduced drinking, whilst tolerance developed to the effects of 0.1 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT. Ipsapirone, at low doses, was without effect on drinking. At high doses, all four drugs reduced drinking both acutely and chronically. Repeated treatment with buspirone (3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg) reduced licking and panel entries, but induced a selective decrease in licking at the low dose (1.0 mg/kg). Similar effects were seen following raclopride treatment, although the effects were less selective. 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone, in contrast reduced licking only at the highest dose, and both drugs increased panel entries as testing continued. The effects of buspirone resembled those of raclopride whereas the effects of ipsapirone resembled those of 8-OH-DPAT. Buspirone appears to act as a dopamine antagonist in this test. The effects of the drugs suggest that SIP depends upon motivational and performance factors which may be more sensitive to drug manipulation than potential underlying psychological factors such as anxiety or stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7871008     DOI: 10.1007/bf02247361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  29 in total

1.  Dose-response analysis of the effects of buspirone on rearing in rats.

Authors:  K S Panickar; N McNaughton
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.153

2.  The effects of chlordiazepoxide on the development of adjunctive drinking in rats.

Authors:  D J Sanger; D E Blackman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 3.  The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior.

Authors:  J L Falk
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1971-05

4.  Effects of repeated treatment with 5-HT1A agonists on active avoidance responding in the rat.

Authors:  K Ensler; C N Ryan; J L Evenden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Trimipramine-induced neuroleptic malignant syndrome after transient psychogenic polydipsia in one patient.

Authors:  J R Langlow; R D Alarcon
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  Pharmacology and neurochemistry of buspirone.

Authors:  L A Riblet; D P Taylor; M S Eison; H C Stanton
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.384

7.  Blockade of alpha 2-adrenoceptors by 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (PmP) in vivo and its relation to the activity of buspirone.

Authors:  G Bianchi; S Garattini
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1988-03-15       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Effects of 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) after repeated administration on a conditioned avoidance response (CAR) in the rat.

Authors:  J L Evenden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Effects of 8-OH-DPAT on motor activity in the rat.

Authors:  V Hillegaart; M L Wadenberg; S Ahlenius
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Schedule-induced polydipsia suppresses pituitary-adrenal activity in rats.

Authors:  L P Brett; S Levine
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1979-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Serotonergic activity of HP 184: does spontaneous release have a role?

Authors:  C P Smith; A T Woods-Kettelberger; R Corbett; S M Chesson; G M Bores; W W Petko; J E Roehr; S Kongsamut
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.996

2.  Effects of repeated treatment with 5-HT1A agonists on active avoidance responding in the rat.

Authors:  K Ensler; C N Ryan; J L Evenden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Evidence that the anxiolytic-like effects of chlordiazepoxide on the elevated plus maze are confounded by increases in locomotor activity.

Authors:  G R Dawson; S P Crawford; N Collinson; S D Iversen; M D Tricklebank
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  The effects of repeated treatment with 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on the lever press responding of the rat under FI and DRL schedules of food reinforcement.

Authors:  J Evenden; C Ryan; W Palejko
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis, Homeostatic Satiety, and Compulsions: What Can We Learn From Polydipsia?

Authors:  Tomek J Banasikowski; Emily R Hawken
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.