Literature DB >> 7870244

[Comparative study of disk surgery with or without microscopy. A prospective study of 80 cases].

J Lagarrigue1, P Chaynes.   

Abstract

The authors report a randomized prospective study of 80 patients operated for lumbar disc herniation. In one group of patients, the operator used a microscopic discectomy, in the other group, the surgery was performed through an interlaminar approach without microscopic magnification. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon. The results have been evaluated by a blind neurosurgeon after 12 to 18 months. 90% patients of the two groups have an excellent or a good outcome following the criteria of Mac Nab. There is no difference, regarding the outcome, between microscopic and non-microscopic removal of disc herniation. Using the microscope does not influence the operating time, the post operative inpatient stay and the time off-work. The authors conclude that the use of the microscope, can facilitate the operation and give a better visual comfort, but does not improve the final results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7870244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurochirurgie        ISSN: 0028-3770            Impact factor:   1.553


  10 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Bronius Spakauskas; Kazys Vytautas Ambrozaitis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse.

Authors:  J N A Gibson; G Waddell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

Review 4.  Sciatica: what the rheumatologist needs to know.

Authors:  Maurits van Tulder; Wilco Peul; Bart Koes
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 5.  Microdiscectomy compared with standard discectomy: an old problem revisited with new outcome measures within the framework of a spine surgical registry.

Authors:  F Porchet; V Bartanusz; F S Kleinstueck; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; D Grob; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Surgical techniques for sciatica due to herniated disc, a systematic review.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Mark P Arts; Maurits W van Tulder; Sidney M Rubinstein; Marienke van Middelkoop; Raymond W Ostelo; Arianne P Verhagen; Bart W Koes; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Timing and minimal access surgery for sciatica: a summary of two randomized trials.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN51857546].

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul; Ronald Brand; Bart W Koes; Ralph T W M Thomeer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Effect of Duration of Symptoms on the Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sherwan A Hamawandi; Injam I Sulaiman; Ali M Abdulhameed
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  Open fenestration discectomy versus microscopic fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sherwan A Hamawandi; Injam Ibrahim Sulaiman; Ameer Kadhim Al-Humairi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.