Literature DB >> 7870095

Intercomparison in cytogenetic dosimetry among five laboratories from Latin America.

O F Garcia1, A T Ramalho, M Di Giorgio, S S Mir, M E Espinoza, J Manzano, N Nasazzi, I López.   

Abstract

As part of a regional International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) collaborative project within Latin America, five countries participated in an intercomparison in cytogenetic dosimetry. Coded slides for chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus analyses were prepared by the coordinator laboratory which organized the exercise and sent to the other participating laboratories. For estimates of dose, each laboratory scored the frequency of dicentrics in metaphases and the frequency of micronuclei in binucleated cells. The lymphocytes were irradiated with 60Co gamma-rays (0, 0.75, 1.5 and 3.0 Gy). Eleven of the 15 estimates of dose based on dicentrics and nine of the 12 based on micronuclei fell within +/- 30% of the true dose. When considering the uncertainties of the dose estimates, the true dose fell within the 95% confidence limits of the estimates on eight of the 15 occasions for dicentrics and four of the 12 for micronuclei.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7870095     DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)00066-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  8 in total

Review 1.  Radiation signature on exposed cells: Relevance in dose estimation.

Authors:  Venkatachalam Perumal; Tamizh Selvan Gnana Sekaran; Venkateswarlu Raavi; Safa Abdul Syed Basheerudeen; Karthik Kanagaraj; Amith Roy Chowdhury; Solomon Fd Paul
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-28

2.  Biological Dosimetry by the Triage Dicentric Chromosome Assay - Further validation of International Networking.

Authors:  Ruth C Wilkins; Horst Romm; Ursula Oestreicher; Leonora Marro; Mitsuaki A Yoshida; Y Suto; Pataje G S Prasanna
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Delayed mitogenic stimulation decreases DNA damage assessed by micronucleus assay in human peripheral blood lymphocytes after (60)co irradiation.

Authors:  G Tamizh Selvan; M Bhavani; J Vijayalakshmi; F D Paul Solomon; N K Chaudhury; P Venkatachalam
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Flow cytometry-assisted quantification of γH2AX expression has potential as a rapid high-throughput biodosimetry tool.

Authors:  Daniel G Achel; Antonio M Serafin; John M Akudugu
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Evaluation of the annual Canadian biodosimetry network intercomparisons.

Authors:  Ruth C Wilkins; Lindsay A Beaton-Green; Sylvie Lachapelle; Barbara C Kutzner; Catherine Ferrarotto; Vinita Chauhan; Leonora Marro; Gordon K Livingston; Hillary Boulay Greene; Farrah N Flegal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Intercomparison in Cytogenetic Dosimetry among 22 Laboratories in China.

Authors:  Jian Xiang Liu; Yan Pan; Jian Lei Ruan; Chunnan Piao; Xu Su
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2016-12-30

7.  Validation of the dicentric chromosome assay for radiation biological dosimetry in South Korea.

Authors:  Younghyun Lee; Young Woo Jin; Ruth C Wilkins; Seongjae Jang
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Assessment of simulated high-dose partial-body irradiation by PCC-R assay.

Authors:  Ivonne Romero; Omar García; Ana I Lamadrid; Eric Gregoire; Jorge E González; Wilfredo Morales; Cécile Martin; Joan-Francesc Barquinero; Philippe Voisin
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.724

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.